2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.10.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant deer Megaloceros giganteus Blumenbach, 1799 (Cervidae, Mammalia) from Palaeolithic of Eastern Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the observed antler deformity was described without the use of any method such as radiography. For the same reason, a revision of the measurements of the skull using modern methods was made by one of us (KP) and has been described by Croitor et al (2014), with the conclusion that the skull morphometry corresponds to that of larger specimens from Ireland according to Lister (1994).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the observed antler deformity was described without the use of any method such as radiography. For the same reason, a revision of the measurements of the skull using modern methods was made by one of us (KP) and has been described by Croitor et al (2014), with the conclusion that the skull morphometry corresponds to that of larger specimens from Ireland according to Lister (1994).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7). Indeed, the metapodials from Kent's Cavern perfectly correspond to metapodial measurements of the robust short-limbed form of giant deer (Lister, 1994;Croitor et al, 2014). The radius- ulna Nr.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…According to Shikama and Tsugawa (1962), a certain degree of pachyostosis is recorded also in Sinomegaceros yabei. Three mandible specimens of S. yabei, two of which certainly belong to a male, are characterized by a rather moderate degree of pachyostosis similar to the specimens of M. giganteus tentatively ascribed to females by Lister (1994) and Croitor et al (2014). Lister (1994) supposed that pachyostosis represents an adaptation that enhanced the skeletal calcium store, related to the large size of antlers.…”
Section: Evolutionary Significance Of Pachyostosismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the relatively large orbits may be a secondary effect caused by the shortened splanchnocranium. It seems that proportions of the lower tooth series in Megaceroides (PP/MM -45.0%, 52.9%, 60.5%: Croitor, 2014) tend to be more advanced than in Megaloceros giganteus from Ireland (PP/MM -53.6-61.1%, based on the sample stored in NHML), and significantly more advanced (according to evolutionary trends in Cervidae described by Vislobokova, 1990) than in the primitive form of Megaloceros giganteus from Bisnik, Poland (PP/MM -61.9-65.6%: Croitor et al, 2014). The presented here analysis of cranial characters of various Eurasian cervids confirms the old assumption of Joleaud (1914) on intermediary morphological and systematic position of Megaceroides between Megaloceros and Dama.…”
Section: Systematic Position Of the Genus Megaceroidesmentioning
confidence: 95%