1984
DOI: 10.1086/161602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant molecular clouds in the Galaxy. I - The axisymmetric distribution of H2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
186
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
186
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At last, we share Solomon & Barrett (1991) point of view: "CO to H 2 conversion factor is fairly robust -robust but not perfect". Chaty et al (1996) used X CO = 3.6 × 10 20 K −1 km −1 s cm −2 (Sanders et al 1984) and T * A instead of T mb . We calculated the integrated antenna temperature in the 12 CO(J = 1−0) line for each molecular cloud for which we considered 25 percent uncertainty of the estimated value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At last, we share Solomon & Barrett (1991) point of view: "CO to H 2 conversion factor is fairly robust -robust but not perfect". Chaty et al (1996) used X CO = 3.6 × 10 20 K −1 km −1 s cm −2 (Sanders et al 1984) and T * A instead of T mb . We calculated the integrated antenna temperature in the 12 CO(J = 1−0) line for each molecular cloud for which we considered 25 percent uncertainty of the estimated value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deciding how to disentangle between the near and far distance has been a major difficulty in estimating the properties of Galactic molecular gas. Different methods have been used to circumvent this difficulty: (1) association with objects at known distance, such as H ii regions (Kolpak et al 2003); (2) 21 cm absorption (Roman-Duval et al 2009); (3) the cloud mass-size relationship (Roman-Duval et al 2010); (4) Galactic axial symmetry (Scoville & Solomon 1975;Gordon & Burton 1976;Sanders et al 1984;Bronfman et al 1988); and (5) two Gaussian latitude profiles (Clemens et al 1988;Nakanishi & Sofue 2006).…”
Section: Cloud Angular Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the CO(2−1) beam is 12 ∼ 40 pc on the major axis, however, the inclination of the plane limits the resolution. Typically, gaseous discs in the centre of galaxies have a characteristic scaleheight of 50 pc, as determined in the Milky Way (e.g., Sanders et al 1984). The inclined line of sight across the disc of M 31 encompasses a region of size = tan(77 • ) × 50 pc = 216 pc in the direction parallel to the minor axis (while it is the size of the beam, 40 pc, in the perpendicular direction).…”
Section: Special Case Of M 31mentioning
confidence: 99%