2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(00)01079-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant motion of La atom inside C82 cage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
110
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
110
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2. This is in contrast to reported results for other metal atoms such as Sc, Y and La in 82, 8,28,29,30,31,32 where the metal atoms are found to be centered inside the fullerene cage on top of the C 2v axis six-membered ring. As discussed in Section II, the NPA charge partitioning tends to give better results; our Gd@82 calculations agree with this analysis, as the Mulliken charge analysis indicates charge transfer of 1.43 electrons from Gd atom to the C 82 cage, and NPA indicates a charge transfer of 2.43 electrons.…”
Section: B Structure Of Gd@82contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…2. This is in contrast to reported results for other metal atoms such as Sc, Y and La in 82, 8,28,29,30,31,32 where the metal atoms are found to be centered inside the fullerene cage on top of the C 2v axis six-membered ring. As discussed in Section II, the NPA charge partitioning tends to give better results; our Gd@82 calculations agree with this analysis, as the Mulliken charge analysis indicates charge transfer of 1.43 electrons from Gd atom to the C 82 cage, and NPA indicates a charge transfer of 2.43 electrons.…”
Section: B Structure Of Gd@82contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Similar experimental data on La@C 82 is less conclusive, with a broader mode centered at ∼45-50 cm −1 for La@C 82 [29], though theoretical studies have predicted 'lateral' La-cage modes at 27 and 30 cm −1 [32], slightly higher than our extracted value. This lateral metal-cage mode in La@C 82 has also been identified using x-ray powder diffraction maximum entropy method (MEM) analysis [19], where a large charge density distribution was attributed to 'giant motion'. La would therefore be expected to give a significantly lower metal-cage frequency than from the tight distribution observed for Sc and Y in the C 82 cage [20,21], consistent with our results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…These, along with x-ray diffraction measurements, have shown the metal atom to be off centre in the cage [19][20][21], with charge transfer to the cage dependent on the metal ion species [22]. These previous EPR studies have primarily used CW spectroscopy and few T 2 times have have been accurately extracted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Since the first X-ray structural determination of Y@C 82 , [19] the molecular structures of various monometallofullerenes M@C 82 have been determined by 13 C NMR [5][6][7]13] and X-ray analyses. [21,23,32,33] In particular, Gd@C 82 [32] and Eu@C 82 [33] have an anomalous structure, in which the metal atom having 7 electrons in f orbital is located on the C 2 axis but is adjacent to the CÀC double bond. This is the opposite position along the molecular axis to that of other monometallofullerenes with C 2v symmetry of the C 82 cage so far reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%