1977
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(77)90572-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant, Mushroom-Shaped Osteoma of the Orbit Originating from the Maxillary Sinus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
9
0
6

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These include trauma, infection, inflammation, low-grade irritation from adjacent blood vessels, hormonal or genetic factors, or contact by sites of distinct embryological origins [8,[18][19][20]. The female to male ratio found in our literature review was 4:1, suggestive of hormonal influences on underlying bone [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These include trauma, infection, inflammation, low-grade irritation from adjacent blood vessels, hormonal or genetic factors, or contact by sites of distinct embryological origins [8,[18][19][20]. The female to male ratio found in our literature review was 4:1, suggestive of hormonal influences on underlying bone [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, traumatic, infectious, and developmental origins have been proposed. 7 Osteomas are usually solitary lesions. Multiple osteomas should raise a suspicion of Gardner Syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sim ilarly, an infective or in¯am m atory stim ulus has been suggested; however, once again, no convincing history of such an event is found in the m ajority of cases. 8 M iller et al 9 suggested that osteom as arise along sites of contact between tissues of different em bryologic origin. This does not explain the w ith the advent of high quality T 2-weighted fast spin echo M RI scanning even small bony lesions are likely to be identi® ed through their displacement of soft tissue structures, as in the case we present here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%