2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant Negative Terahertz Photoconductivity in Controllably Doped Carbon Nanotube Networks

Abstract: A strong negative photoconductivity was identified in thin film networks of single-walled carbon nanotubes using optical pump, THz probe spectroscopy. The films were controllably doped, using either adsorption doping with different p-type dopant concentrations or ambipolar doping using an ionic gate. While doping enhanced the THz conductivity and increased the momentum scattering rate, interband photoexcitation lowered the spectral weight and reduced the momentum scattering rate. This negative THz photoconduct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
7
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore conclude that the change of photoconductivity observed upon push–pulse arrival is neither related to a change in the free-carrier density (previously proposed to result from hot-carrier trapping 39 ), nor to changes in the mobility of charge carriers. 43 These mechanisms would cause a significant change in the DC (0 THz) conductivity that is absent in the data shown in Figure 5 . Instead, the interaction of hot carriers with the THz pulse results in stimulated emission of THz photons, increasing the apparent transmission of the probe and leading to a reduction of the apparent THz conductivity, as calculated directly from the transmission intensity of the probe.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We therefore conclude that the change of photoconductivity observed upon push–pulse arrival is neither related to a change in the free-carrier density (previously proposed to result from hot-carrier trapping 39 ), nor to changes in the mobility of charge carriers. 43 These mechanisms would cause a significant change in the DC (0 THz) conductivity that is absent in the data shown in Figure 5 . Instead, the interaction of hot carriers with the THz pulse results in stimulated emission of THz photons, increasing the apparent transmission of the probe and leading to a reduction of the apparent THz conductivity, as calculated directly from the transmission intensity of the probe.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We note that previous discussions of negative photoconductivity have focused exclusively on low-dimensional materials such as graphene 44 47 and doped nanowires. 43 Therefore, we hope that our discovery of negative photoconductivity in a 3D bulk semiconductor such as tin-iodide perovskite will trigger further discussion about origins of photoinduced conductivity reductions in semiconductors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dielectric constant of L = 10 was used in the calculations to represent polarisation effect of the crystal lattice and the photoconductivity and dark conductivity due to free charge-carriers in the film were assumed to be real (DC Drude conductivity) photoconductivities, lower than 10 −1 cm −1 in the case of 400-nm-thick films. However, neither of the equations discussed above provides enough accuracy for calculating the photoconductivity of doped semiconductors, as has been previously pointed out by Burdanova et al [34]. These approximations assume a lack of conductivity of the unexcited sample, which is invalid in doped semiconductors.…”
Section: Photoconductivity: Common Approachmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[213,229,230] Jensen et al [229] performed a comparative study of the ultrafast electronic transport in graphene nanoribbons and in semiconducting carbon nanotubes: both types of spectra were fit by a Drude-Smith model and the scattering time in CNTs was found to be significantly longer than in carbon nanoribbons. [213,229,230] Jensen et al [229] performed a comparative study of the ultrafast electronic transport in graphene nanoribbons and in semiconducting carbon nanotubes: both types of spectra were fit by a Drude-Smith model and the scattering time in CNTs was found to be significantly longer than in carbon nanoribbons.…”
Section: Thz Response Of Carbon Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 99%