“…The birefringence of a material is often closely related to the polarization anisotropy, which is determined by the arrangement of its functional groups. In general, non-π-conjugated units, such as [BO 4 ] and [PO 4 ] units, have a large HOMO–LUMO band gap, which is conducive to the blue shift of the cutoff edge, but their low polarization anisotropy leads to small birefringence. , According to the fluorine substitution strategy, partial oxygen atoms in [BO 4 ] and [PO 4 ] are replaced by F, resulting in [MO x F 4– x ] ( x +1)– (M = B, x = 1, 2, 3; M = P, x = 2, 3) groups, which can provide a good balance between birefringence and band gap, − such as AB 4 O 6 F (A = NH 4 , Na, Rb, Cs), MB 5 O 7 F 3 (M = Mg, Ca, Sr, Pb), (NH 4 ) 2 PO 3 F, and so on. − In contrast, π-conjugated elements such as [BO 2 ], [MO 3 ] (M = B, C, N), and [H x C 3 N 3 O 3 ] ( x = 0, 1, 2, 3) with triangular or planar structures are conducive to the enhancement of birefringence. − In addition, the lone pair electron of I 5+ in iodates has stereochemical activity, which is conducive to the generation of greater birefringence. − Recently, the introduction of fluorine atoms into iodates has become an increasingly hot research topic because the negative effect of lone pair electrons on the UV cutoff edge can be compensated. Meanwhile, more abundant and diverse structures can be obtained.…”