2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-018-0472-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant Planet Formation and Migration

Abstract: Planets form in circumstellar discs around young stars. Starting with sub-micron sized dust particles, giant planet formation is all about growing 14 orders of magnitude in size. It has become increasingly clear over the past decades that during all stages of giant planet formation, the building blocks are extremely mobile and can change their semimajor axis by substantial amounts. In this chapter, we aim to give a basic overview of the physical processes thought to govern giant planet formation and migration,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not a very sharp criterion in practice, and the Type II migration arising in very clean gaps, as typically considered for a Jupiter-like case corresponds to a planet of mass ∼ 10 M 1 . The reader should also note that the various parameters used in the literature for this non-linearity or thermal criterion often differ by small factors of order unity, and some with the same scaling are derived through different physical arguments (Lin & Papaloizou 1993;Korycansky & Papaloizou 1996;Ward 1997;Paardekooper & Johansen 2018) 1 . Feedback and vortices: Where the planet mass is large enough for the wake dissipation to alter the local disc surface density profile, and hence alter the Lindblad torques, the feedback slows planet migration.…”
Section: Migration Behaviour Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not a very sharp criterion in practice, and the Type II migration arising in very clean gaps, as typically considered for a Jupiter-like case corresponds to a planet of mass ∼ 10 M 1 . The reader should also note that the various parameters used in the literature for this non-linearity or thermal criterion often differ by small factors of order unity, and some with the same scaling are derived through different physical arguments (Lin & Papaloizou 1993;Korycansky & Papaloizou 1996;Ward 1997;Paardekooper & Johansen 2018) 1 . Feedback and vortices: Where the planet mass is large enough for the wake dissipation to alter the local disc surface density profile, and hence alter the Lindblad torques, the feedback slows planet migration.…”
Section: Migration Behaviour Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the broader framework of satellite-disk interactions, a large surface density gradient leads to a dramatic enhancement in the corotation torque. In turn, this effect preferentially pulls the migrating object into the region of higher density(Masset et al 2006;Paardekooper & Johansen 2018). Therefore, the surface density jump envisioned byMosqueira & Estrada (2003a, 2003b) is likely to operate as a reversed planet trap, briefly accelerating-instead of halting-Callisto's orbital decay.5 We note that contrary to this assumption,Sasaki et al (2010) argue that the planetary magnetosphere may effectively truncate the circumplanetary disk, halting the inward migration of satellites at the inner edge.6 The satellite systems of Uranus and Neptune are beyond the scope of our study, as they likely have a distinct origin from the scenario considered herein (see, e.g., the recent work ofIda et al 2020).7 Contrary to accretion disks-where long-term viscous evolution leads to the gradual sinking of nebular material toward the central object-decretion disks are systems where gas and dust are slowly expelled outwards.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed physics of the planet-disk gravitational interaction is a complicated topic (see e.g. the review by Paardekooper & Johansen 2018). Planetary mass is an important parameter that defines the regime of migration.…”
Section: Planet Migration In Gaseous Diskmentioning
confidence: 99%