Giant Strain and Induced Ferroelectricity in Amorphous BaTiO3 Films under Poling

Abstract

Abstract:We report an effect of giant surface modification of a 5.6 nm thick BaTiO 3 film grown on Si (100) substrate under poling by conductive tip of a scanning probe microscope (SPM). The surface can be locally elevated by about 9 nm under −20 V applied during scanning, resulting in the maximum strain of 160%. The threshold voltage for the surface modification is about 12 V. The modified topography is stable enough with time and slowly decays after poling with the rate~0.02 nm/min. Strong vertical piezoresponse after poling is observed, too. Combined measurements by SPM and piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) prove that the poled material develops high ferroelectric polarization that cannot be switched back even under an oppositely oriented electric field. The topography modification is hypothesized to be due to a strong Joule heating and concomitant interface reaction between underlying Si and BaTiO 3 . The top layer is supposed to become ferroelectric as a result of local crystallization of amorphous BaTiO 3 . This work opens up new possibilities to form nanoscale ferroelectric structures useful for various applications.

Electrostriction, Electroresistance, and Electromigration in Epitaxial BaTiO3-Based Heterostructures: Role of Interfaces and Electric Poling

“…In summary, on Nb:STO substrates a maximum step height is observed at remanence after V > 0 poling, on Pt after V < 0 poling, and in both cases the step occurrence is associated with a sudden and important increase of the sample resistance. Surface deformations after PFM poling were reported recently by Vaghefi et al, and these authors attributed it to Joule heating induced by the current through the sample during the poling . Our results fully exclude this interpretation because the deformation occurs when the low current state sets in and consequently when the Joule effect (if any) is less important.…”

“…Surface deformations after PFM poling were reported recently by Vaghefi et al, and these authors attributed it to Joule heating induced by the current through the sample during the poling. 34 Our results fully exclude this interpretation because the deformation occurs when the low current state sets in and consequently when the Joule effect (if any) is less important.…”