2013
DOI: 10.1002/wics.1273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gibbs ensembles for incompatible dependency networks

Abstract: In most statistical applications, the Gibbs sampler is the method of choice for inference regarding conditionally specified distributions that are compatible. Compatibility ensures that a unique Gibbs distribution exists. For machine learning of complex models such as dependency networks, the conditional models are sometimes incompatible. In this paper, we review an ensemble approach using the Gibbs sampler as the base procedure. A Gibbs ensemble consists of many joint distributions resulting from different sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fixed-scan Gibbs samplers follow a prefixed order of sampling-e.g., for 3 variables, X 1 → X 2 → X 3 → X 1 and so on [3]. However, the fixed-scan pseudo-Gibbs sampler, which is commonly used in Bayesian estimation, is not optimal for potentially incompatible conditional distributions in the sense that the conditional distributions derived from the inferred joint distribution may have large error variances [4,5]. It has been shown that by exploiting the full range of possible scan orders, either through a technique called the Gibbs ensemble or through randomizing the scan order during sampling [15] in the pseudo-Gibbs procedure, one can substantially reduce the level of incompatibility measured in error variances.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixed-scan Gibbs samplers follow a prefixed order of sampling-e.g., for 3 variables, X 1 → X 2 → X 3 → X 1 and so on [3]. However, the fixed-scan pseudo-Gibbs sampler, which is commonly used in Bayesian estimation, is not optimal for potentially incompatible conditional distributions in the sense that the conditional distributions derived from the inferred joint distribution may have large error variances [4,5]. It has been shown that by exploiting the full range of possible scan orders, either through a technique called the Gibbs ensemble or through randomizing the scan order during sampling [15] in the pseudo-Gibbs procedure, one can substantially reduce the level of incompatibility measured in error variances.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%