2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4891992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gibbs states on random configurations

Abstract: Gibbs states of a spin system with the single-spin space S = R m and unbounded pair interactions is studied. The spins are attached to the points of a realization γ of a random point process in R n . Under certain conditions on the model parameters we prove that, for almost all γ, the set G(S γ ) of all Gibbs states is nonempty and its elements have support properties, explicitly described in the paper. We also show the existence of measurable selections γ → νγ ∈ G(S γ ) (random Gibbs measures) and derive the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar way, one can prove the statements mentioned above if the underlying graph is as in the random connection model, see [18,31,33] or a tempered Gibbs random field, see [17,Corollary 3.7]. The only condition is that the graph almost surely has the summability property as in Proposition 4, see [14] for more detail.…”
Section: The Overview Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a similar way, one can prove the statements mentioned above if the underlying graph is as in the random connection model, see [18,31,33] or a tempered Gibbs random field, see [17,Corollary 3.7]. The only condition is that the graph almost surely has the summability property as in Proposition 4, see [14] for more detail.…”
Section: The Overview Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…By similar arguments, one can show that G t (β|γ ) is compact in the L-topology. Finally, let us mention that u > 2 in (14) and θ in Proposition 4 should be such that θ(u − 2) > 2. Under this condition the sufficiently fast decay of the tail of χ compensates destabilizing effect of the property (9) of the underlying graph, see [26] for more detail.…”
Section: Holds Uniformly For All μ ∈ G T (β|γ )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the projected measure M does not coincide with the Gibbs measure µ Φ and cannot be described in terms of position-position interactions alone. Thus it is not clear whether the existence result from [10] could be used in order to prove the existence of the annealed Gibbs measure µ. Furthermore, (2.46) indicates that one cannot directly compare (e.g., by means of various correlation inequalities known for measures on S γ , see e.g.…”
Section: Remark 7 a Results That Seems To Be Completely New For This Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,4,29]. The corresponding Gibbs measures µ γ on the product spaces S γ were constructed in [10]. The relationship between Gibbs measures of these two types can be expressed by the disintegration formula…”
Section: Remark 7 a Results That Seems To Be Completely New For This Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation