Gida Güvenli̇ği̇ İçi̇n Tahil Üreti̇mi̇ni̇n Etki̇n Desteklenmesi̇ne Yöneli̇k Öneri̇ler

Kıymaz, Taylan

doi:10.17065/huniibf.1224182

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Trade restrictions such as import quotas and high tariffs rates are also cited as contributing factors to domestic inflation in Türkiye by IMF [38] and WTO [39]. From another perspective, the decline in the agrarian population, the rise in input prices, and the changes in global warming and climate conditions further trigger inflation [40].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unraveling the Major Determinants behind Price Changes in Four Selected Representative Agricultural Products

Tandogan Aktepe,

Kayral

2024

Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to analyze the drivers behind price changes in agricultural products in Türkiye from 2002 to 2021, considering the impacts of three crises of different causes which are the global food crisis, the Russia–Türkiye aircraft crisis, and the COVID-19 pandemic. The potential factors are categorized into four subgroups: governmental effects, agricultural inputs, macroeconomic indicators, and climatic conditions. The selected agricultural goods for price change measurement include wheat and maize representing subsistence goods, and olive oil and cotton as marketing goods. The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model is applied to observe both the short- and long-term impacts of the variables on price developments. The results suggest that government effectiveness, regulatory quality, nitrogen use, water price, money supply, exchange rate, and GDP under the related categories are the most effective factors in price changes. Among the variables under the category of climatic conditions, significant values are obtained only in the analysis of the temperature impact on olive oil. The analysis also reveals the variable impact of crises on the prices of the chosen products, depending on the goods involved. The maize and wheat analyses yield particularly noteworthy results. In the long run, nitrogen use demonstrates a substantial positive impact, registering at 29% for wheat and 19.47% for maize, respectively. Conversely, GDP exhibits a significant negative impact, with 26.15% and 20.08%. Short-term observations reveal that a unit increase in the governmental effect leads to a reduction in inflation for these products by 17.01% and 21.42%. However, changes in regulatory quality result in an increase in inflation by 25.45% and 20.77% for these products, respectively.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%