1986
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6807(198607)23:3<247::aid-pits2310230303>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gifted children and visual-motor development: A comparison of Bender-Gestalt and VMI test performance

Abstract: A sample of 63 gifted elementary‐school students was administered the Bender Visual‐Motor Gestalt Test and the Developmental Test of Visual‐Motor Integration for comparative purposes and to test Koppitz hypothesis that gifted students have advanced visual‐motor development. Group results revealed no significant differences between the two tests, that they did correlate significantly, and that younger students in particular had advanced visual‐motor development when tested using these two tools.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DeMers, Wright, and Dappen (1981) found higher standard scores for the VMI over the Bender Gestalt in a sample of children with learning and adjustment issues. Furthermore, several studies reported no significant differences between scores on these measures for various special populations (Knoff & Sperling, 1986;Shapiro & Simpson, 1994;Skeen et al, 1982;Spirito, 1980).…”
Section: Comparability Of the Two Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DeMers, Wright, and Dappen (1981) found higher standard scores for the VMI over the Bender Gestalt in a sample of children with learning and adjustment issues. Furthermore, several studies reported no significant differences between scores on these measures for various special populations (Knoff & Sperling, 1986;Shapiro & Simpson, 1994;Skeen et al, 1982;Spirito, 1980).…”
Section: Comparability Of the Two Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, DeMers, Wright, and Dappen (1981) reported higher performance on the VMI versus the BG in a sample of children with learning issues. Other studies assessing special populations reported no significant differences between standard scores on these measures (Knoff & Sperling, 1986; Shapiro & Simpson, 1994). These findings have led to questions about the extent to which the two measures can be used interchangeably.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%