1975
DOI: 10.1177/006996677500900202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gifts and affines in north India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, dowry has emerged at the lower end of the class hierarchy in northern Kerala. This experience does not accord with the dominant explanations of dowry either as a mode of devolution of property or pre-mortem inheritance (Tambiah, 1989;Upadhya, 1990) or as an aspect of gift-giving relations that regulated kinship (Raheja, 1995;Vatuk, 1975). Nor does it support the theory that dowry has expanded through the influence of kanyadana as an ideology (in which a girl is conceived of as a gift and given in marriage with other expensive gifts), and the adoption of its forms of marriage as a mode of achieving upward social mobility (Benei, 1995;Kapila, 2004: Parry, 1979van der Veen, 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast, dowry has emerged at the lower end of the class hierarchy in northern Kerala. This experience does not accord with the dominant explanations of dowry either as a mode of devolution of property or pre-mortem inheritance (Tambiah, 1989;Upadhya, 1990) or as an aspect of gift-giving relations that regulated kinship (Raheja, 1995;Vatuk, 1975). Nor does it support the theory that dowry has expanded through the influence of kanyadana as an ideology (in which a girl is conceived of as a gift and given in marriage with other expensive gifts), and the adoption of its forms of marriage as a mode of achieving upward social mobility (Benei, 1995;Kapila, 2004: Parry, 1979van der Veen, 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Anthropological literature on the importance of the ritual role of brothers (Agarwal 1995;Vatuk 1975;Wadley 1976) has underlined the considerations that prevent women from taking such a bold step. A number of studies support Basu's findings that many women actually gave up their shares in the natal property to avoid ''angering their brothers and sisters-in-law and to preserve the natal home as a space of emotional wealth contrasting with the quotidian realm of work, duty and abnegation in married life'' (Basu 1999, 227).…”
Section: Jevan Baithen Hain Sār Bahnoiyā Sarvā Ke Cuvein Hain āNsuiyāmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53. See, e.g., Dumont 1986: 237-58, 284-92;Fruzzetti 1990;Raheja 1988;and Vatuk 1975, to cite a handful of examples from a very extensive literature. 54.…”
Section: What Hannahmentioning
confidence: 99%