2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00360-023-01490-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gill surface area allometry does not constrain the body mass scaling of maximum oxygen uptake rate in the tidepool sculpin, Oligocottus maculosus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for G. maculatus reared in each temperature and oxygen treatment, the scaling exponent for S MMR did not statistically differ from zero, revealing that GSA grows to meet the maximal oxygen requirements of fish independent of their environment. Equivalent results for the tidepool sculpin Oligocottus maculosus across a smaller size range have been reported (Somo et al, 2023). These findings, combined with a significant decrease of MMR scaling exponents in aquatic ectotherms with warming (Rubalcaba et al, 2020), suggest that factors other than the gills may be responsible for any reduction in MMR of larger fish in warmer settings.…”
Section: Does Gsa Meet Metabolic Requirements Through Ontogeny?mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, for G. maculatus reared in each temperature and oxygen treatment, the scaling exponent for S MMR did not statistically differ from zero, revealing that GSA grows to meet the maximal oxygen requirements of fish independent of their environment. Equivalent results for the tidepool sculpin Oligocottus maculosus across a smaller size range have been reported (Somo et al, 2023). These findings, combined with a significant decrease of MMR scaling exponents in aquatic ectotherms with warming (Rubalcaba et al, 2020), suggest that factors other than the gills may be responsible for any reduction in MMR of larger fish in warmer settings.…”
Section: Does Gsa Meet Metabolic Requirements Through Ontogeny?mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For example, GOL assumes that the scaling of GSA is constrained by surface area to volume ratios, which ultimately constrain metabolic rate and growth. In contrast, critics argue that there is substantial evidence that GSA scales proportional to metabolic rate in order to meet metabolic demands ( Lefevre et al, 2017 , 2018 ; Somo et al, 2023 ; Prinzing et al, 2023 ) and that gills can be highly plastic and dynamic structures such that GSA can acclimate to changes in oxygen demand such as those induced by climate warming ( Wegner and Farrell, 2023 ). Despite such concerns, estimates of climate impacts on fisheries have been generated by models based on GOL assumptions ( Cheung et al, 2013 ) as well as integrated into International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) climate change biological impact assessments ( Cheung and Pauly, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%