1988
DOI: 10.13031/2013.30945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gin-stand Feed Rate Effects on Cotton Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant difference in seed damage between trial days does not reflect the applied treatments in the modified gin. The seed damage was very low in these trials compared with values reported by other researchers using the same measurement, e.g., ranging from 9% to 12% for different gin feed rates (Moore and Shaw, 1967) and from 6% to 26% for different moisture levels (Mangialardi et al, 1988;Columbus and Mangialardi, 1996). More trials are required over a wider range of seed Tables 4 through 7 list the ANOVA results for the effects of the three tested factors on HVI fiber length, strength, color, and trash properties, and figures 8 through 11 show the main effects plots.…”
Section: Residual Lint Seed Damage and Fiber Quality Effectssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The significant difference in seed damage between trial days does not reflect the applied treatments in the modified gin. The seed damage was very low in these trials compared with values reported by other researchers using the same measurement, e.g., ranging from 9% to 12% for different gin feed rates (Moore and Shaw, 1967) and from 6% to 26% for different moisture levels (Mangialardi et al, 1988;Columbus and Mangialardi, 1996). More trials are required over a wider range of seed Tables 4 through 7 list the ANOVA results for the effects of the three tested factors on HVI fiber length, strength, color, and trash properties, and figures 8 through 11 show the main effects plots.…”
Section: Residual Lint Seed Damage and Fiber Quality Effectssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Mangialardi (1985) evaluated nep formation at the gin and determined that gin stands were a major contributor to nepping during gin processing. In another study, ginning rates from 305 to 1,393 kg (1.4 to 6.4 bales) of lint/h did not significantly affect nep count for a gin stand rated at 1,043 kg (4.8 bales) of lint/h (Mangialardi et al, 1988). Holt and Laird (2007, 2008, 2010 conducted more recent studies on their patented powered roll gin stand to increase production and turnout without reducing fiber quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The SFC in cotton lint is inversely related to yarn strength and can directly affect the quality of a finished product (Anthony, 1985;Krifa et al, 2001). Neps are small knots of tangled fibers, which are created during boll development, harvesting, ginning, and yarn manufacturing (Mangialardi et al, 1988). Neps may affect manufacturing, cause non-uniform dyeing, and affect the appearance of woven fabrics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous prior studies : Griffin Jr and McCaskill (1969); Childers and Baker (1978) ;Griffin Jr. (1979); Anthony (1985) ;Mangialardi Jr. et al (1988) ;Mangialardi Jr. and Anthony (2005); Byler (2006); Holt and Laird (2008); Armijo et al (2013); Hughs and Armijo (2013); among others, have examined the fiber quality impact of factors such as: tooth design, gin saw diameter, saw spacing, rotational speed, ginning capacity or processing rate, seed cotton foreign matter and moisture content, and seed roll: size; shape; agitation; and density. Though cotton gin saws have been produced in multiple thicknesses for many decades, as far as we know this is the first study to report fiber quality as a function of gin saw thickness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%