2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gini estimation under infinite variance

Abstract: We study the problems related to the estimation of the Gini index in presence of a fattailed data generating process, i.e. one in the stable distribution class with finite mean but infinite variance (i.e. with tail index α ∈ (1, 2)). We show that, in such a case, the Gini coefficient cannot be reliably estimated using conventional nonparametric methods, because of a downward bias that emerges under fat tails. This has important implications for the ongoing discussion about economic inequality.We start by discu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where i and j are indices to run through the entire population A of agents who have S index surplus resources. Though there are many problems with describing whole distributions with a single number, by computing the Gini Coefficient over the entire population rather than sampling the population, by not assuming a particular distribution, and by only using Gini Coefficients as relative measures for comparing populations of the same size, these inaccuracies can be minimized (Fontanari et. al., 2018).…”
Section: Inequality Sensitivities To Agent Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where i and j are indices to run through the entire population A of agents who have S index surplus resources. Though there are many problems with describing whole distributions with a single number, by computing the Gini Coefficient over the entire population rather than sampling the population, by not assuming a particular distribution, and by only using Gini Coefficients as relative measures for comparing populations of the same size, these inaccuracies can be minimized (Fontanari et. al., 2018).…”
Section: Inequality Sensitivities To Agent Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, as mean age decreases to and below 10, the effects of chaotic population trajectories appear. 2 Comparisons of inequality distributions measured with a single ratio has both mathematical [8,6] and practical difficulties [21,18]. Equally sized populations are fully sampled in comparisons for the former and total wealth is also considered for the latter.…”
Section: Wealth Inequality Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x, which, under fat-tailed distributions, as many socio-economic variables tend to be, may be undefined. In such cases, as shown in [52], the Gini coefficient cannot be reliably estimated with non-parametric methods and will result in a downward bias emerging under fat tails.…”
Section: Spreading Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%