2010
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.20328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ginzburg‐Landau vortex dynamics driven by an applied boundary current

Abstract: In this paper we study the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations on a smooth, bounded domain R 2 , subject to an electrical current applied on the boundary. The dynamics with an applied current are nondissipative, but via the identification of a special structure in an interaction energy, we are able to derive a precise upper bound for the energy growth. We then turn to the study of the dynamics of the vortices of the solutions in the limit " ! 0. We first consider the original time scale in which the vorti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of considering the boundary conditions (1.1e,f,g), it is possible to use an equivalent boundary condition where we prescribe instead the magnetic field. As in [38] we note that by (1.1b,e,f), on each point on ∂Ω, except for the corners, we have…”
Section: Equivalent Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead of considering the boundary conditions (1.1e,f,g), it is possible to use an equivalent boundary condition where we prescribe instead the magnetic field. As in [38] we note that by (1.1b,e,f), on each point on ∂Ω, except for the corners, we have…”
Section: Equivalent Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This result suggests, once again, that stability is being forced not only by the magnetic field that the current induces, but also by the potential term in (1.1a). We conclude the foregoing literature survey by mentioning a few works considering the motion of vortices under the action of an electric current [38,37,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This is due to the strength of the forcing terms (now in |log ε| instead of constant) and pinning terms, and it is a significant difference: while the η can be taken small enough (< π inf b) so that no additional vortex can appear, there can still be an energy of the same order as the vortex energy floating around. The usual proofs of dynamics mentioned above [Li1,Li2,JS,Sp,Ti,Mi,KMMS] use the fact that from a priori bounds, the energy density 1 |log ε| e ε (u ε ) can only concentrate at the vortex locations and converges in the sense of measures to π δ a i (t) where the a i (t) are the vortex centers. Here we cannot use this and have to accept the possibility of another term in the limiting energy measure, which is not necessarily concentrated at points, and with which we work until we eventually can prove it is zero by a Gronwall argument.…”
Section: Methods Of the Proof And Case Of The Ginzburg-landau Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the main force driving the dynamics (possibly supplemented with the forcing of Z) in the dynamics derived in [Ti]. It is in particular this computation in finite parts that makes the proofs [Li1,Li2,JS,Sp,Ti,Mi,KMMS] delicate.…”
Section: Methods Of the Proof And Case Of The Ginzburg-landau Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As formally predicted by Chapman and Richardson [15], and first completely proven by [31,49] (see also [29,34] for the conservative case), in the asymptotic regime of a large Ginzburg-Landau parameter, this non-uniform density a translates at the level of isolated vortices into an effective "pinning potential" h = log a, indeed attracting the vortices to the minima of a. As shown in our companion paper [24], the mean-field equations (1.6)-(1.7) are then replaced by (1.1)-(1.2), where the forcing Ψ can be decomposed as Ψ := F ⊥ − ∇ ⊥ h in terms of the pinning force −∇h and of some vector field F : R 2 → R 2 related to the imposed electric current (see also [51,49]). In the conservative regime α = 0, β = 1, the incompressible model (1.1) takes the form of the following inhomogeneous version of the 2D Euler equation: using the identity v ⊥ curl v = (v · ∇)v − 1 2 ∇|v| 2 , and settingP := P − 1 2 |v| 2 ,…”
Section: Brief Discussion Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%