Giomer yapıdaki akışkan kompozit ve adeziv sistemin Sınıf V kavitelerde mikrosızıntı açısından değerlendirilmesi

Gönülol, Nihan; Özer, Sezin; Demirel, Neslihan

doi:10.17214/aot.80802

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Microleakage test is widely used by the researchers to assess the performance of the materials introduced to the market. Despite various methods used for this aim, dye leakage method is mostly preferred as it is fast, easy an economic [12]. Another method used for microleakage studies is the scanning electron microscope (SEM).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Comparison of the Microleakage of Two Different Bulk-Fill Materials in Teeth Disinfected By Ozone Gas

Cellik¹

2016

Adv Dent Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate two different bulk fill restoration materials in ozone gas applied Class V cavities in terms of microleakage.Material and Methods: 32 human molar teeth were used. All the teeth were divided into two main groups, ozone gas and control group, and both groups were then divided into subgroups in which bulk fill technique was applied by two different restoration materials. The occlusal and gingival leakage values of the slice surfaces were observed under the stereo optical microscope and the scores were recorded by an independent researcher. The results were statistically compared to Mann Whitney u test. Results:In terms of microleakage on occlusal and gingival surfaces, no statistically significant difference was found between the main groups consisting of ozone gas and control group (p>0.05). Conclusion:It was established that applying ozone gas as a cavity disinfectant didn't affect Microleakage.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Comparison of the Microleakage of Two Different Bulk-Fill Materials in Teeth Disinfected By Ozone Gas

Cellik¹

2016

Adv Dent Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These early materials suffered from undesirable physiomechanical features, long hardening times, and moisture sensitivity during hardening (3,4). Hybrid restorative materials, such as resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) and polyacid-modified composite resins (5,6), were developed to combine the advantages of GICs with the aesthetic and physiomechanical properties of composite resins. Although the mechanical characteristics of these hybrid materials were an improvement over those of traditional GICs, resin-containing GICs were not suitable for all applications involving permanent teeth.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanical behavior of newly developed glass carbomer-based dental filling material

Arslanoğlu¹,

Kale²,

Meşe

et al. 2019

Int Dent Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This study measured the microhardness of a newly developed glass carbomer dental filling material within the first 24 hours after setting and compared it against that of two different glass ionomers, with and without heating during setting, and a resin-modified glass ionomer. Methodology: Six cavities were prepared on acrylic resin discs. PMMA blocks were randomly divided into six groups of six cylinders and each cavity was filled with one of the tested materials according to their group. The groups were: Group1, Fuji Triage™ with heat; Group 2, GCP Glass Fill™; Group 3, Equia™ with heat; Group 4, Riva LC™; Group 5, Fuji Triage™; and Group 6, Equia™. Microhardness was measured by the Vickers hardness scale using a microindentation hardness tester at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours after initial setting of the materials. Results: After 24 hours, the glass carbomer (GCP Glass Fill™) was not the strongest of the tested materials. Fuji Triage™ with heat applied during setting (Group 1) proved to be the hardest material, while Riva LC™ (Group 4) and GCP Glass Fill™ (Group 2) were the softest. Heating the Fuji Triage™ during the initial setting period significantly increased its physical strength after 24 hours. How to cite this article: Arslanoğlu Z, Kale E, Meşe A, Altan H. Evaluation of microhardness of newly developed glass carbomer-based dental filling material. Int Dent Res 2019;9(2):58-62. Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

show abstract

Giomer yapıdaki akışkan kompozit ve adeziv sistemin Sınıf V kavitelerde mikrosızıntı açısından değerlendirilmesi

Cited by 2 publications

References 20 publications

The Comparison of the Microleakage of Two Different Bulk-Fill Materials in Teeth Disinfected By Ozone Gas

The Comparison of the Microleakage of Two Different Bulk-Fill Materials in Teeth Disinfected By Ozone Gas

Mechanical behavior of newly developed glass carbomer-based dental filling material

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About