2017
DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2016.1277020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Girl Power: Stipend Programs and the Education of Younger Siblings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The share of older students taking the exam increased in poorer districts, consistent with negative selection. Enrollment spillovers to boys occurred only in households with older girls enrolled in school, consistent with programs in other countries in which reduced schooling costs for girls increased male enrollment within a household (Kim et al 1999a;Begum et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The share of older students taking the exam increased in poorer districts, consistent with negative selection. Enrollment spillovers to boys occurred only in households with older girls enrolled in school, consistent with programs in other countries in which reduced schooling costs for girls increased male enrollment within a household (Kim et al 1999a;Begum et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We also contribute to the broader literature on efforts to close the gender gap in access and learning. Several other studies have evaluated similar programs targeting girls (Kim et al 1999a, 1999b, and Chaudhury and Parajuli 2010Filmer and Schady 2008 for Cambodia;Kremer et al 2009 for Kenya;Baird et al 2011 for Malawi;Begum et al 2012 for Bangladesh; and the previously mentioned Kazianga et al 2013 andPrakash 2013 for Burkina Faso and India, respectively), with a consensus finding that reducing the cost of attendance leads to gains in enrollment. Of these, however, only Baird et al (2011) examines learning outcomes among secondary school students as we do, using a program more local in scope than our setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bangladesh, since the mid-1990s, the government has introduced many education policies targeting female children, including compulsory free primary education and a female stipend program in secondary schools in rural areas. These policies have led to more gender parity in enrolment in both primary and lower-secondary levels (Begum et al, 2017;Hahn et al, 2018), but female students still lag behind their male counterpart in learning outcomes (Asadullah and Chaudhury, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Compared to private school students, students in public schools earn higher scores, particularly in English (0.16 standard deviations for girls 20 Other programs that targeted girls for reduced schooling costs have also shown increases in male enrollment (Kim et al, 1999a;Begum et al, 2012), which the authors explain as a spillover to male siblings. Our data do not allow us to distinguish siblings among test takers or enrolled in other grades, however.…”
Section: Zeromentioning
confidence: 97%