2003
DOI: 10.2979/hyp.2003.18.3.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Girls Blush, Sometimes: Gender, Moral Agency, and the Problem of Shame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…66 Shame then relates to the whole of the individual's character. 67 Groups are shamed through a variety of means including 'hate speech or group defamation, harassment, social distancing, social distrust, and objectification'. 68 Women who are voluntarily childless are shamed and oppressed through social reprisal and negative assessments as seen in the stereotypes detailed earlier.…”
Section: Th E Soci a L C Ons T Ru C Ti On Of R Eg Re Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…66 Shame then relates to the whole of the individual's character. 67 Groups are shamed through a variety of means including 'hate speech or group defamation, harassment, social distancing, social distrust, and objectification'. 68 Women who are voluntarily childless are shamed and oppressed through social reprisal and negative assessments as seen in the stereotypes detailed earlier.…”
Section: Th E Soci a L C Ons T Ru C Ti On Of R Eg Re Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the latter has appeared in the pages of this journal, and I am delighted that the current special issue consolidates Hypatia's engagement with gendered shame. Over the years, influential articles by Jill Locke, Erin Taylor and Laura Ebert Wallace, Luna Dolezal, Jennifer Manion, Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Ellen K. Feder, and Ullaliina Lehtinen have been published by Hypatia (Lehtinen 1998;Manion 2003;Lyerly 2006;Locke 2007;Dolezal 2010;Feder 2011;Taylor and Wallace 2012), and the special issue should be read as a continuation of this feminist work on shame, constituting an expressly feminist shame theory for the twenty-first century that builds upon and critically extends the feminist leitmotif of shame.…”
Section: Situating Gendered Shame In Contemporary Trends In Feminist mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 According to the liberal view, shame is a painful experience of oneself as diminished or inadequate because of a failure to live up to one's autonomously chosen standards, expectations, values, or ends (Taylor 1985, chap. 3;Manion 2003). Although unpleasant, experiences of shame are on this account constructive and even salutary in that they exert pressure on us to recommit ourselves to what we really value, and thereby return us to ''moral equilibrium'' (Taylor 1985, chap.…”
Section: Emotional Memories Ptsd and The Mechanism Of Propranololmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11. These views diverge on the question of whether we should jettison the liberal conception of shame altogether and replace it with the alternative, given how the liberal conception of shame ignores the relational nature of the self and therefore fails as a viable account of anyone's shame (Dillon 1997;Calhoun 2004), or whether instead we should understand shame experiences as different in kind for the privileged and the subordinate (Bartky 1990;Lehtinen 1998;Manion 2003). As I am of the view that selves are relational, I take it that the alternative conception of shame outlined below can itself account for the differences in valence between the shame of the privileged and that of the subordinate and, that, if plausible, it deposes the liberal view.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%