Girls Blush, Sometimes: Gender, Moral Agency, and the Problem of Shame

Manion, Jennifer

doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2003.tb00820.x

Cited by 42 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to some researchers, genetic and environmental factors may explain differences in boys and girls in terms of moral emotions (Tangney and Dearing 2002); that is, both boys and girls can feel ashamed, but the type of situation explains the differences in feeling (e.g. Benetti-McQuoid and Bursik 2005;Manion 2003). These differences are linked to the different social roles attributed to boys and to girls.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Specific Combinations of Parent–Child Relationships Predict Moral Values?

Grégoire

Pauwels

2019

Deviant Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study we examined to what extent different combinations of parentchild relationships explain adolescents' moral values and whether the influence of school and peers predicts moral values. We also investigated whether anticipated shame and anticipated guilt predict moral values. A convenience sample of 1,120 adolescents, including 120 adolescents in youth custody, was used. Results suggest that combinations of parentchild relationships do not predict moral values, that school and peers are significant predictors of adolescents' moral values, and anticipated shame and guilt do not consistently and equally predict moral values. Results were highly similar for boys and girls.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Specific Combinations of Parent–Child Relationships Predict Moral Values?

Grégoire

Pauwels

2019

Deviant Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Positive accounts of shame understand shame as both self‐ and community‐affirming (Aristotle et al., 1984; Aristotle NM; Calhoun, 2016; Locke, 2007; Manion, 2003; Steinbock, 2014; Tarnopolsky, 2004; Williams, 2008). On these accounts, shame draws the self into relation with community norms and traditions in a self‐improving encounter.…”

Section: Tell the Truth Shame The Devil: Shameful Subjects And Shamel...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Shamelessly Blue: Pitch Complexes and the Social Otherwise

Warmack

2024

Philosophy Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Early american Black Blueswomen—such as Ma Rainey, Alberta Hunter, Bessie Smith, Billie Holiday, and Nina Simone—perform Blues as a praxis that both critiques and transforms the ways in which american Black people were—and continue to be—excluded from the construct of the human subject. Merleau‐Ponty's account of inter‐subjectivity is predicated on his account of the human subject who is always‐already in a social milieu in which they are never taken for an object. Subjectivity is affirmed through the subject's ability to differentiate itself from objects via sight. In this way the human subject is sensorially, affectively, epistemically, and axiologically organized as eye‐forward. The human subject's ability to exceed objectification runs counter to the lived experiences of a number of precaritized peoples, specifically, american Black people. If being seen without being objectified is the lived experience of the subject, then subjectivity is an exclusive way‐of‐ being in the world. Rather than inhabit this exclusion from human subjectivity as a lack, american Black people—as is evidenced by Blues—create a social otherwise with distinct ways of living—not just surviving or enduring—created within, but not wholly determined by, the pornotrope or the wake. This paper begins to sound out a way that this social otherwise breathes life into its own socio‐ethical experience via a turn to the aural. This paper takes up Blues to explore what expressive and affective ways‐of‐ being in the world are possible with an ear‐forward sensorial organization.

show abstract

“…Its most insidious impacts are often its impacts on the sense of self ( Goffman, 1963 ; Link & Phelan, 2014 ; Murray et al, 2015 ). An important impact of stigma is that it can lead to the emotion of shame, a painful negative evaluation of the global self, or the whole identity ( Manion, 2003 ).…”

Section: Understanding Stigma and Violencementioning

confidence: 99%

The Reaffirmation of Self? Narrative Inquiry for Researching Violence Against Women and Stigma

Ballantine

2021

Violence Against Women

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stigma presents specific ethical and epistemological problems for qualitative researchers of violence against women. Narrative research methods promise to enable ethical research on violence while still offering deep insight into stigmatized topics. This article describes narrative methods used in six focus group discussions and four in-depth interviews with victim-survivors of violence against women, all African migrant women living in Ireland. The article connects narrative and stigma in research with the social lives of participants. It concludes with specific recommendations for creative uses of narrative inquiry to explore stigmatized themes, noting that stigma can never be entirely removed from the research encounter.

show abstract

Girls Blush, Sometimes: Gender, Moral Agency, and the Problem of Shame

Cited by 42 publications

References 35 publications

Do Specific Combinations of Parent–Child Relationships Predict Moral Values?

Do Specific Combinations of Parent–Child Relationships Predict Moral Values?

Shamelessly Blue: Pitch Complexes and the Social Otherwise

The Reaffirmation of Self? Narrative Inquiry for Researching Violence Against Women and Stigma

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About