Girls’ education: The power of policy discourse

Abstract

Girls' education has been a focus of international development policy for several decades. The discursive framing of international organizations' policy initiatives relating to girls' education, however, limits the potential for discussing complex gender issues that affect the possibilities for gender equity. Because discourse shapes our understanding of reality, the emphases and omissions of policy language can affect our understanding of complex issues such as the challenges of girls' education in international development. Using feminist critical policy discourse analysis, this study analyzes 300 policy documents, published between 1995 and 2008, that represent the 'public face' of 14 organizations active in the field of international development education. We examine three types of discursive arguments given in the documents for educating girls: justice arguments, utility arguments, and empowerment arguments. We show that the robustness of 'gender', and related concepts such as equity and equality as theoretical constructs, are limited, which is a factor constraining what can be understood as important in gender equity in education. Policy remains focused on girls and not gender (or boys), and on easily measurable indicators (counting boys and girls in school). This policy discourse does little to recognize that gender as a social process reproduces -or has the potential to challenge -social inequities.

From Schoolgirls to “Virtuous” Khmer Women: Interrogating Chbab Srey and Gender in Cambodian Education Policy

“…Aligned with the special issue's thematic foci, this article centers Chbab Srey as an important context for teachers' lived experiences and girls' access to "genderredistributed" curriculum (Kirk, 2004, p. 394). We apply policy discourse analysis (Allan, 2008;Anderson, 2016;Monkman & Hoffman, 2013) to describe how Chbab Srey is embedded in policies that affect girls and female teachers in Cambodia.…”

Likabehandlingsarbete - en reproduktion av rådande maktordning?

“…Oavsett vilken roll de har går det att utläsa både explicita och implicita budskap i dokumenten. I en amerikansk studie EDUCARE 51 (Monkman & Hoffman, 2013) där 300 dokument analyserats framkommer exempelvis att synen på flickor och pojkar som biologiska kön där lätt mätbara indikatorer används som utgångspunkt i jämställdhetsarbetet. Den rådande diskursen i dokumenten framhåller således inte kön som en social konstruktion som skapas och återskapas över tid och rum, utan som en dikotomi där pojkar och flickor framstår som varandras motsatser.…”

Unraveling the ‘female teacher effect’: The positioning and agency of female teachers in girls’ education reform

“…In sub-Saharan Africa, one instantiation of this call is the argument that more women teachers are needed in order to support girls' learning and school completion (Haugen et al, 2014). With girls' educational outcomes typically (though not always) lagging behind boys' (Chisamya, DeJaeghere, Kendall, & Khan, 2012), a plethora of both government and international donor activity concentrates on improving girls' education (Monkman & Hoffman, 2013). In many African countries, teaching professions are largely male-dominated (Chudgar & Luschei, 2016).…”