2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40677-019-0119-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GIS-multicriteria evaluation using AHP for landslide susceptibility mapping in Oum Er Rbia high basin (Morocco)

Abstract: Background: High basin of Oum Er Rbia River, which is located in Middle Atlas Mountain region, is prone to landslide problems due to the geological features combined with the climate change and human activities. The present work including inventory mapping was conducted to establish landslide susceptibility map using GIS-based spatial multicriteria approach. Eight landslide-related factors, including land cover, lithology, distance to road, distance to fault, distance to drainage network, elevation, aspect and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
69
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
69
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision analysis technique combines primary-and secondary-level weights for every causative factor, where primary weights are similar to the bivariate approach and secondary weights are expert-opinion-based. For secondary weights, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has become popular and has been successfully applied for decision-making systems [60,61]. AHP uses a pairwise relative comparison between every landslide-causative factor.…”
Section: Landslide Susceptibility Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision analysis technique combines primary-and secondary-level weights for every causative factor, where primary weights are similar to the bivariate approach and secondary weights are expert-opinion-based. For secondary weights, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has become popular and has been successfully applied for decision-making systems [60,61]. AHP uses a pairwise relative comparison between every landslide-causative factor.…”
Section: Landslide Susceptibility Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 23.8%, 31.8%, and 26.3% of landslides fall into moderate, high, and very high landslide susceptibility classes. A landslide susceptibility map produced using certainty factor model (Table 3), very low and low susceptibility classes cover 17.8% and 31.0% of the total study area, however, 28.8%, 19.0% and 3.4% of the total area fall into moderate, high and very high landslide susceptibility classes, respectively. As indicated in Table 3, 4.7% and 12.3% of the landslide fall in very low and low susceptibility classes of the study area, respectively.…”
Section: Landslide Susceptibility Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering 13 landslide-related factors, they achieved the proposed maps with 78.53%, 79.35%, and 79.40% prediction accuracies, respectively for WoE, SI, and FR models. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is another popular method employed in landslide susceptibility mapping [14,15]. Yan, et al [16] used the integration of AHP with normalized FR with the cloud model for landslide susceptibility assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%