2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26832-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GIST Descriptors for Sign Language Recognition: An Approach Based on Symbolic Representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sign language recognition research works have been addressed at finger spelling level in [2,13,14,23,26,27], at word level [12,17,26] and at sentence level [4,16,17]. The techniques which gained importance due to their performance by research community are Ichetrichef moments [7], Gray level histogram [31], Sensor based glove technique [7,8,11,21], Hidden Morkov Models (HMM) [1], Hu moments and Electromyography (EMG) segmentation [1], Localized contour sequence [11], Size function [19], Transitionmovement [6], Moment based size function [9], Convex chain coding and Basic chain code [21], Fourier descriptors [23], Grassman Covariance Matrix (GCM) [33], Fusion of appearance based and 5DT glove based features [21], Sparse Observation (SO) description [29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sign language recognition research works have been addressed at finger spelling level in [2,13,14,23,26,27], at word level [12,17,26] and at sentence level [4,16,17]. The techniques which gained importance due to their performance by research community are Ichetrichef moments [7], Gray level histogram [31], Sensor based glove technique [7,8,11,21], Hidden Morkov Models (HMM) [1], Hu moments and Electromyography (EMG) segmentation [1], Localized contour sequence [11], Size function [19], Transitionmovement [6], Moment based size function [9], Convex chain coding and Basic chain code [21], Fourier descriptors [23], Grassman Covariance Matrix (GCM) [33], Fusion of appearance based and 5DT glove based features [21], Sparse Observation (SO) description [29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods such as Elastic graph matching [44], modified census transformation [30], weighted Eigenspace size function [33], Hidden Markov Models (HMM) [3], weighted combination of geometric and appearance based features such as the area, gravity center [8], moment based size function [26], outline hand length and downscale intensity directly extracted from images in video frames [45] have been studied for user-independent hand posture recognition.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a practical continuous sign language recognition system needs to be signer independent. In order to address the problem of signer independent recognition system, it is necessary to device a robust representation system, which is tolerant to signer variations and yield good generalization; however, this has not received much attention in the literature except the work reported in [28,45].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research works reported for sign language recognition have addressed the task at finger spelling level [2,12,13,21,24,25], at word level [11,17,24] and at sentence level [4,15,16]. Some of the techniques proposed by the research community, which gained importance due to their performance are Ichetrichef moments [6], Gray level histogram [29], Sensor based glove technique [6,7,10,17], Hidden Morkov Models (HMM) [1], Hu moments and Electromyography (EMG) segmentation [1], Localized contour sequence [10], Size function [17], Transition-movement [5], Moment based size function [8], Convex chain coding and Basic chain code [28], Fourier descriptors [22], Grassman Covariance Matrix (GCM) [31], Fusion of appearance based and 5DT glove based features [19], Sparse Observation (SO) description [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since signs used by hearing impaired people are very abstract, the sign language recognition based on fingerspelling or word seems to be cumbersome and not effective. With this observation, recently only two attempts were reported to address the problem at sentence level [4,15,16]. Therefore, there is scope for many more attempts in this direction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%