Giving birth in a pandemic: women’s birth experiences in England during COVID-19

Abstract

Background Expectant parents worldwide have experienced changes in the way they give birth as a result of COVID-19, including restrictions relating to access to birthing units and the presence of birthing partners during the birth, and changes to birth plans. This paper reports the experiences of women in England. Methods Data were obtained from both closed- and open-ended responses collected as part of the national COVID in Context of Pregnancy, Infancy and Parenting (CoCoPIP) Study online survey (n = 477 families) between 15th July 2020 – 29th March 2021. Frequency data are presented alongside the results of a sentiment analysis; the open-ended data was analysed thematically. Results Two-thirds of expectant women reported giving birth via spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) (66.1%) and a third via caesarean section (CS) (32.6%) or ‘other’ (1.3%). Just under half (49.7%) of the CS were reported to have been elective/planned, with 47.7% being emergencies. A third (37.4%) of participants reported having no changes to their birth (as set out in their birthing plan), with a further 25% reporting COVID-related changes, and 37.4% reporting non-COVID related changes (e.g., changes as a result of birthing complications). One quarter of the sample reported COVID-related changes to their birth plan, including limited birthing options and reduced feelings of control; difficulties accessing pain-relief and assistance, and feelings of distress and anxiety. Under half of the respondents reported not knowing whether there could be someone present at the birth (44.8%), with 2.3% of respondents reporting no birthing partner being present due to COVID-related restrictions. Parental experiences of communication and advice provided by the hospital prior to delivery were mixed, with significant stress and anxiety being reported in relation to both the fluctuating guidance and lack of certainty regarding the presence of birthing partners at the birth. The sentiment analysis revealed that participant experiences of giving birth during the pandemic were predominately negative (46.9%) particularly in relation to the first national lockdown, with a smaller proportion of positive (33.2%) and neutral responses (19.9%). Conclusion The proportion of parents reporting birthing interventions (i.e., emergency CS) was higher than previously reported, as were uncertainties related to the birth, and poor communication, leading to increased feelings of anxiety and high levels of negative emotions. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Becoming a mother during the COVID‐19 pandemic: The lived experience as told by birthing mothers: A qualitative study

“…Primiparous women, unlike those who have already been through motherhood, have a personal experience influenced by thoughts of acquiring a new role and entirely new caring responsibilities (Caroli & Sagone, 2014 ). Furthermore, our study, in agreement with the literature (Ajayi et al, 2021 ; Aydin et al, 2022 ), demonstrates that the limited presence of a close family member, especially during childbirth, leads birthing mothers to be more afraid of possible complications and to perceive physical pain more vividly. The resilience of a mother in childbirth, that is, the ability to cope with and overcome a traumatic event or period of difficulty, is related to the time she spends with her close family relative.…”

“We Should Be Working Together, and It Felt like They Disrupted That”: Pregnant Women and Partners’ Experiences of Maternity Care in the First UK COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown

“…They employed a variety of strategies to cope with these experiences. These findings cohere with wider literature on the pandemic, including expectant parents’ need for reliable information in the face of ‘chaotic’ messaging [ 17 ], uncertainty about maternity care restrictions and disruptions to birth plans [ 18 ]. In a situation of such uncertainty, including at governmental and health service levels, the increased psychological distress is unsurprising.…”

‘Nesting networks’: Women's experiences of social network support in high-risk pregnancy

“…Not all participants were interviewed twice during pregnancy and two were not interviewed postnatally due to loss to follow up caused by lockdown during the pandemic. Three postnatal interviews took place after the pandemic lockdown began in March 2020 which would have created an enforced change to their social networks that may not have existed otherwise, but this study does not address changes in social networks that resulted from the national lockdowns of 2020-21 [54].…”