2004
DOI: 10.18806/tesl.v21i2.175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giving Students a Fighting Chance: Pragmatics in the Language Classroom

Abstract: In order to give language learners a fighting chance outside the classroom, teachers must provide them with consciousness-raising opportunities for developing pragmatic awareness. By attending to pragmatic factors in second-language (L2) situations, students will be better able to make informed decisions in negotiating effective communication., This article examines the potential use of the pragmatic discourse completion task (DCT) as a springboard for discussion in the L2 classroom. A description of a DCT use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blum-Kulka, House, and Kasper (1989) found that "even fairly advanced language learners' communicative acts regularly contain pragmatic errors, or deficits, in that they fail to convey or comprehend the intended illocutionary force or politeness value" (p. 10). Furthermore, it has been suggested that pragmatic development may be inhibited in the absence of classroom instruction (Bardovi-Harlig, 2001;McLean, 2004). Therefore, the findings of this study suggest that it is worthwhile for Canadian language teachers to spend more time in their classrooms explaining and discussing norms of "Canadian" politeness to IBs and how these norms might vary, if at all, from IBs' own cultures.…”
Section: Other Specific Applications To Language Teachingmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Blum-Kulka, House, and Kasper (1989) found that "even fairly advanced language learners' communicative acts regularly contain pragmatic errors, or deficits, in that they fail to convey or comprehend the intended illocutionary force or politeness value" (p. 10). Furthermore, it has been suggested that pragmatic development may be inhibited in the absence of classroom instruction (Bardovi-Harlig, 2001;McLean, 2004). Therefore, the findings of this study suggest that it is worthwhile for Canadian language teachers to spend more time in their classrooms explaining and discussing norms of "Canadian" politeness to IBs and how these norms might vary, if at all, from IBs' own cultures.…”
Section: Other Specific Applications To Language Teachingmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Halliday (1972) and Hymes (1973) said that learners should learn language not only linguistically, but also to achieve communicative goals. Acquisition of pragmatic competence becomes fundamental part of the communicative competence as it studies the relation between language use and its sociocultural rules (Bachman, 1990;Canale and Swain, 1980;Celce-Murcia 1995;Mc. Lean, 2004).…”
Section: Speech Act Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learners, he keeps, need to acquire competence as to when to speak, and what to talk about with whom, where and in what manner in order to use language appropriately. McLean (2004) believes that taking pragmatics into account would give students a fighting chance, stating that, by attending to pragmatic factors in second language situations, students will be better able to make informed choices in negotiating effective communication. Meaning is not something that is inherent in the words alone.…”
Section: Language Pragmaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%