Students' and Teachers' Values, Attitudes, Feelings and Beliefs in Mathematics Classrooms 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70244-5_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gjennomgang and Genomgång: Same or Different?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such tasks do neither reflect real life nor the relevance of mathematics but are meant to instill school mathematics conventions of answer formats (numbers and symbols, not narratives), of using one solution method just taught (Lave, 1992;Gerofsky, 1996;Säljö et al, 2009), and of a focus on one correct answer (and not on nuancing the correctness by commenting, for instance, that there can be humans and insects on the ship contributing to the count of legs). Typical cultural features of traditional school mathematics observed in the country of the current study (Norway) entail a monological practice of a teacher in front of a board demonstrating techniques (Andrews and Nosrati, 2018), the drilling of techniques through numerous tasks similar to the ones shown by the teacher (Nergaard, 2017), and an emphasis on pure mathematics (Espeland, 2017). As a result of this school mathematics culture, students are exposed to a confined mathematical world, in which they can neither select topics of interest nor explore what would be relevant to them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such tasks do neither reflect real life nor the relevance of mathematics but are meant to instill school mathematics conventions of answer formats (numbers and symbols, not narratives), of using one solution method just taught (Lave, 1992;Gerofsky, 1996;Säljö et al, 2009), and of a focus on one correct answer (and not on nuancing the correctness by commenting, for instance, that there can be humans and insects on the ship contributing to the count of legs). Typical cultural features of traditional school mathematics observed in the country of the current study (Norway) entail a monological practice of a teacher in front of a board demonstrating techniques (Andrews and Nosrati, 2018), the drilling of techniques through numerous tasks similar to the ones shown by the teacher (Nergaard, 2017), and an emphasis on pure mathematics (Espeland, 2017). As a result of this school mathematics culture, students are exposed to a confined mathematical world, in which they can neither select topics of interest nor explore what would be relevant to them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite such autonomy, mathematics lessons in both countries, irrespective of a student's age, are structurally similar and typically comprise two phases. Teachers undertake a whole-class going-through of the lesson's new material, known as gjennomgang in Norway and genomgång in Sweden (Andrews & Nosrati, 2018), before inviting students to complete exercises from their textbooks (Andrews & Larson, 2017;Lepik et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Swedish mathematics education, the lesson commonly starts or ends with a "going-through" (genomgång) Andrews and Nosrati (2018). identified three kinds of going-through: when teachers tell the students what to work on, the presentation of new models, and demonstrating solutions to problems that students find difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%