2016
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-4-895-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glaciation's topographic control on Holocene erosion at the eastern edge of the Alps

Abstract: Abstract. What is the influence of glacial processes in driving erosion and uplift across the European Alps? It has largely been argued that repeated erosion and glaciation sustain isostatic uplift and topography in a decaying orogen. But some parts of the Alps may still be actively uplifting via deep lithospheric processes. We add insight to this debate by isolating the role of post-glacial topographic forcing on erosion rates. To do this, we quantify the topographic signature of past glaciation on millennial… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likely, the rates represent maximum rates as the nuclide production at the lower lying fan position is lower compared to the higher elevated source areas. The Guttannen catchment, which has only been limitedly affected by debris flow activity, revealed higher nuclide concentrations [(1.6–2.3) × 10 4 at/g] and, thus, accordingly lower apparent denudation rates of 0.6 to 0.9 mm/yr that are typically found in the Alps (Dixon et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Likely, the rates represent maximum rates as the nuclide production at the lower lying fan position is lower compared to the higher elevated source areas. The Guttannen catchment, which has only been limitedly affected by debris flow activity, revealed higher nuclide concentrations [(1.6–2.3) × 10 4 at/g] and, thus, accordingly lower apparent denudation rates of 0.6 to 0.9 mm/yr that are typically found in the Alps (Dixon et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cosmogenic nuclides studies dedicated to deriving alpine regional averaged denudation rates usually assume that large(r) spatial scales (i.e. catchments > 10–20 km 2 ) should sufficiently average perturbations from mass wasting events, despite mixed global results (Portenga and Bierman, ; Dixon et al, ). Similarly, sediment budget studies also suggest sufficient buffering of perturbations in larger catchments due to more effective mixing that allows shredding of episodic signals (de Vente et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the VAR-16-2, TIN-16-1, and VES-16-2 subbasins, we used subbasin 10 Be denudation rates (Table 2). We used the OCTOPUS database (Codilean et al, 2018) to acquire data from the Alps (Buechi et al, 2014;Chittenden et al, 2014;Delunel et al, 2010;Dixon et al, 2016;Glotzbach et al, 2013;Grischott et al, 2017a;Molliex et al, 2016;Norton et al, 2008Norton et al, , 2011Savi et al, 2014;Wittmann et al, 2007Wittmann et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Comparison With Previously Published 10 Be Studies Across Thmentioning
confidence: 99%