Glans penis and prepuce colonisation of yeast fungi in a paediatric population: pre‐ and postcircumcision results

Aridogan, Ibrahim Atilla; İlkit, Macit; İzol, Volkan; Ateş, Aylin; Demırhındı, Hakan

doi:10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01535.x

Cited by 18 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…and Malassezia spp., in samples from the prepuce and glans penis of uncircumcised (62.5%) compared to circumcised (37.5%) boys in Turkey ( P < 0.01). Arıdogan et al also highlighted the potential medical benefits of circumcision as a significant factor decreasing the colonisation rate of Candida and Malassezia yeast.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimated burden of serious human fungal diseases in Turkey

Polat

Seyedmousavi

İlkit

et al. 2018

Mycoses

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current number of fungal infections occurring each year in Turkey is unknown. We estimated the burden of serious human fungal diseases based on the population at risk, existing epidemiological data from 1920 to 2017 and modelling previously described by the LIFE program (http://www.LIFE-worldwide.org). Among the population of Turkey (80.8 million in 2017), approximately 1 785 811 (2.21%) people are estimated to suffer from a serious fungal infection each year. The model used predicts high prevalences of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis episodes (312 994 cases) (392/100 000), of severe asthma with fungal sensitisation (42 989 cases) (53.20 cases/100 000 adults per year), of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (32 594 cases) (40.33/100 000), of fungal keratitis (26 671 cases) (33/100 000) and of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (5890 cases) (7.29/100 000). The estimated annual incidence for invasive aspergillosis is lower (3911 cases) (4.84/100 000 annually). Among about 22.5 million women aged 15-50 years, recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis is estimated to occur in 1 350 371 (3342/100 000) females. The burden of three superficial fungal infections was also estimated: tinea pedis (1.79 million), tinea capitis (43 900) and onychomycosis (1.73 million). Given that the modelling estimates reported in the current study might be substantially under- or overestimated, formal epidemiological and comprehensive surveillance studies are required to validate or modify these estimates.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimated burden of serious human fungal diseases in Turkey

Polat

Seyedmousavi

İlkit

et al. 2018

Mycoses

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…26 In adults and children, there is fair evidence that periurethral flora contains fewer pathogens after circumcision than before circumcision. 26,27 Because these studies looked at cultures 1 time (4 weeks after the circumcision), the long-term significance of the findings is unclear.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The preputial space provides an environment that is thought to "trap" pathogens and bodily secretions and favor their survival and replication. 26,27,34 The circumcised male has no foreskin and may likely provide a less welcoming environment for such substances. In addition, STI-containing secretions have increased contact time in the prospective uncircumcised male host, which may increase the likelihood of transmission and infection.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Male Circumcision

Blank¹,

Brady²,

Buerk³

et al. 2012

Pediatrics

299

149

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Male circumcision consists of the surgical removal of some, or all, of the foreskin (or prepuce) from the penis. It is one of the most common procedures in the world. In the United States, the procedure is commonly performed during the newborn period. In 2007, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) convened a multidisciplinary workgroup of AAP members and other stakeholders to evaluate the evidence regarding male circumcision and update the AAP’s 1999 recommendations in this area. The Task Force included AAP representatives from specialty areas as well as members of the AAP Board of Directors and liaisons representing the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Task Force members identified selected topics relevant to male circumcision and conducted a critical review of peer-reviewed literature by using the American Heart Association’s template for evidence evaluation. Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks; furthermore, the benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for families who choose it. Specific benefits from male circumcision were identified for the prevention of urinary tract infections, acquisition of HIV, transmission of some sexually transmitted infections, and penile cancer. Male circumcision does not appear to adversely affect penile sexual function/sensitivity or sexual satisfaction. It is imperative that those providing circumcision are adequately trained and that both sterile techniques and effective pain management are used. Significant acute complications are rare. In general, untrained providers who perform circumcisions have more complications than well-trained providers who perform the procedure, regardless of whether the former are physicians, nurses, or traditional religious providers. Parents are entitled to factually correct, nonbiased information about circumcision and should receive this information from clinicians before conception or early in pregnancy, which is when parents typically make circumcision decisions. Parents should determine what is in the best interest of their child. Physicians who counsel families about this decision should provide assistance by explaining the potential benefits and risks and ensuring that parents understand that circumcision is an elective procedure. The Task Force strongly recommends the creation, revision, and enhancement of educational materials to assist parents of male infants with the care of circumcised and uncircumcised penises. The Task Force also strongly recommends the development of educational materials for providers to enhance practitioners’ competency in discussing circumcision’s benefits and risks with parents. The Task Force made the following recommendations:Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks, and the benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for those families who choose it.Parents are entitled to factually correct, nonbiased information about circumcision that should be provided before conception and early in pregnancy, when parents are most likely to be weighing the option of circumcision of a male child.Physicians counseling families about elective male circumcision should assist parents by explaining, in a nonbiased manner, the potential benefits and risks and by ensuring that they understand the elective nature of the procedure.Parents should weigh the health benefits and risks in light of their own religious, cultural, and personal preferences, as the medical benefits alone may not outweigh these other considerations for individual families.Parents of newborn boys should be instructed in the care of the penis, regardless of whether the newborn has been circumcised or not.Elective circumcision should be performed only if the infant’s condition is stable and healthy.Male circumcision should be performed by trained and competent practitioners, by using sterile techniques and effective pain management.Analgesia is safe and effective in reducing the procedural pain associated with newborn circumcision; thus, adequate analgesia should be provided whenever newborn circumcision is performed.Nonpharmacologic techniques (eg, positioning, sucrose pacifiers) alone are insufficient to prevent procedural and postprocedural pain and are not recommended as the sole method of analgesia. They should be used only as analgesic adjuncts to improve infant comfort during circumcision.If used, topical creams may cause a higher incidence of skin irritation in low birth weight infants, compared with infants of normal weight; penile nerve block techniques should therefore be chosen for this group of newborns.Key professional organizations (AAP, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the American College of Nurse Midwives, and other midlevel clinicians such as nurse practitioners) should work collaboratively to:Develop standards of trainee proficiency in the performance of anesthetic and procedure techniques, including suturing;Teach the procedure and analgesic techniques during postgraduate training programs;Develop educational materials for clinicians to enhance their own competency in discussing the benefits and risks of circumcision with parents;Offer educational materials to assist parents of male infants with the care of both circumcised and uncircumcised penises.The preventive and public health benefits associated with newborn male circumcision warrant third-party reimbursement of the procedure. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has endorsed this technical report.

show abstract

“…[37] The frequency of yeast colonization was reduced from 11% to 1.3% ( P < 0.008) by circumcision. [38]…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Penile inflammatory skin disorders and the preventive role of circumcision

Morris

Krieger

2017

Int J Prev Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penile inflammatory skin conditions such as balanitis and posthitis are common, especially in uncircumcised males, and feature prominently in medical consultations. We conducted a systematic review of the medical literature on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cohrane databases using keywords “balanitis,” “posthitis,” “balanoposthitis,” “lichen sclerosus,” “penile inflammation,” and “inflammation penis,” along with “circumcision,” “circumcised,” and “uncircumcised.” Balanitis is the most common inflammatory disease of the penis. The accumulation of yeasts and other microorganisms under the foreskin contributes to inflammation of the surrounding penile tissue. The clinical presentation of inflammatory penile conditions includes itching, tenderness, and pain. Penile inflammation is responsible for significant morbidity, including acquired phimosis, balanoposthitis, and lichen sclerosus. Medical treatment can be challenging and a cost burden to the health system. Reducing prevalence is therefore important. While topical antifungal creams can be used, usually accompanied by advice on hygiene, the definitive treatment is circumcision. Data from meta-analyses showed that circumcised males have a 68% lower prevalence of balanitis than uncircumcised males and that balanitis is accompanied by a 3.8-fold increase in risk of penile cancer. Because of the high prevalence and morbidity of penile inflammation, especially in immunocompromised and diabetic patients, circumcision should be more widely adopted globally and is best performed early in infancy.

show abstract

Glans penis and prepuce colonisation of yeast fungi in a paediatric population: pre‐ and postcircumcision results

Cited by 18 publications

References 19 publications

Estimated burden of serious human fungal diseases in Turkey

Estimated burden of serious human fungal diseases in Turkey

Male Circumcision

Penile inflammatory skin disorders and the preventive role of circumcision

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About