1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.60.9377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glasner-Tompkins relation and reorientation ofUcenters in LiF crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the Glasner-Tompkins empirical rule suggests that the energy difference between the fundamental absorption of an alkali halide and the F band is very nearly a function of only the halide species. Exciton band E X , F band E F , E X − E F and E X − E Y for twelve alkali halides have been reported by Malghani and Smith [39] and for LiH and LiF by Shalabi et al [40]. The dependence of the Glasner-Tompkins relation on the dopant cation and surface coordination number (flat, edge and corner) of MgO, KCl and AgBr has also been reported by Shalabi et al [41].…”
Section: Glasner-tompkins Relationmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In other words, the Glasner-Tompkins empirical rule suggests that the energy difference between the fundamental absorption of an alkali halide and the F band is very nearly a function of only the halide species. Exciton band E X , F band E F , E X − E F and E X − E Y for twelve alkali halides have been reported by Malghani and Smith [39] and for LiH and LiF by Shalabi et al [40]. The dependence of the Glasner-Tompkins relation on the dopant cation and surface coordination number (flat, edge and corner) of MgO, KCl and AgBr has also been reported by Shalabi et al [41].…”
Section: Glasner-tompkins Relationmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In other words, the Glasner-Tompkins empirical rule suggests that the energy difference between the fundamental absorption of an alkali halide and the F band is very nearly a function of only the halide species. Exciton band E X , F band E F , E X À E F and hE X À E F i for twelve alkali halides have been reported by Malghani and Smith [32], and for LiH and LiF by Shalabi et al [33]. The dependence of Glasner-Tompkins relation on the dopant cation and surface coordination number of MgO, KCl and AgBr has been reported by Shalabi et al [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: The Glasner-tompkins Relationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…of the halide species alone. E X , E F , E X -E F , and ͗E X -E F ͘ for twelve alkali halides have been reported by Malghani and Smith,39 and for LiH and LiF by Shalabi et al 40 However, no attempts have been made to clarify the dependence of the Glasner-Tompkins relation on FA centers at the low coordinated surfaces of AgBr.…”
Section: Glasner-tompkins Relationmentioning
confidence: 77%