2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1355-0306(01)71847-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass on clothing and shoes of members of the general population and people suspected of breaking crimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No broken glass Broken glass Petterd et al [10] Lau et al [11] McQuillian et al [8] Ross et al [13] Coulson et al [9] Lambert et al [ reported in previous studies, however the numbers of fragments within individual groups present were more akin to data produced from studies involving individuals suspected of activities involving broken glass.…”
Section: Population (P) Suspects General Population This Studymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…No broken glass Broken glass Petterd et al [10] Lau et al [11] McQuillian et al [8] Ross et al [13] Coulson et al [9] Lambert et al [ reported in previous studies, however the numbers of fragments within individual groups present were more akin to data produced from studies involving individuals suspected of activities involving broken glass.…”
Section: Population (P) Suspects General Population This Studymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A summary of comparisons to the studies of McQuillian et al [8], Coulson et al [9], Pettard et al [10], Lau et al [11], Lambert et al [12] and Ross et al [13] is presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Comparisons Of All Fleeces Examined With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of groups of glass recovered from the surfaces of a garment and the size of any group matching the glass object broken at the scene are crucial when evaluating glass evidence at source or activity level using the Bayesian approach [1,2]. At source level, however, only the number of groups present is important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%