2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass transition and aging of the rigid amorphous fraction in polymorphic poly(butene-1)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the observed endothermic peaks below T a = 80 °C correspond to the enthalpic overshoot as a physically aged glass undergoes the glass transition (this peak is shadowed in purple in Figure B). Moreover, in cyan color, at temperatures between T a = 80 and 150 °C, the overshoot due to the physical aging is no longer visible, and instead, a sharp bell-shaped endotherm associated with the melting process of the crystallites formed during the isothermal steps is observed. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, the observed endothermic peaks below T a = 80 °C correspond to the enthalpic overshoot as a physically aged glass undergoes the glass transition (this peak is shadowed in purple in Figure B). Moreover, in cyan color, at temperatures between T a = 80 and 150 °C, the overshoot due to the physical aging is no longer visible, and instead, a sharp bell-shaped endotherm associated with the melting process of the crystallites formed during the isothermal steps is observed. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in cyan color, at temperatures between T a = 80 and 150 °C, the overshoot due to the physical aging is no longer visible, and instead, a sharp bell-shaped endotherm associated with the melting process of the crystallites formed during the isothermal steps is observed. 32 34 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the endothermic peak approaches zero at 40−50 °C for Form II and 100−110 °C for Form I (the latter figure extrapolated, since it is masked by secondary crystallization above 80 °C) (Figure 7). 72 The authors interpret these data in the frame of a structural recovery of glassy RAF and identify these two temperatures "as the upper limit of the RAF glass transition for the two polymorphs". 72 The origin of this striking difference in "glass transition temperatures" is assigned to strong hindrances of chain motions in the crystal of Form I (denser crystal packing, long-range threefold helix symmetry) that "cause tight constraints within the coupled amorphous phase".…”
Section: Stability and Generation Of The Raf Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…72 The authors interpret these data in the frame of a structural recovery of glassy RAF and identify these two temperatures "as the upper limit of the RAF glass transition for the two polymorphs". 72 The origin of this striking difference in "glass transition temperatures" is assigned to strong hindrances of chain motions in the crystal of Form I (denser crystal packing, long-range threefold helix symmetry) that "cause tight constraints within the coupled amorphous phase". By contrast, the looser crystal packing and lower symmetry of Form II helices [NB: 11 3 ] allow large movements of the chain backbone (even in the crystal, as documented by NMR analyses 73 ) and "decrease the stresses imparted to the amorphous parts linked with the crystals".…”
Section: Stability and Generation Of The Raf Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation