2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1454-9_248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glasses and Aging, A Statistical Mechanics Perspective on

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 438 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, accelerated simulation techniques tend to push systems across energy barriers to accelerate their dynamics, but such accelerated dynamics may not always match the spontaneous dynamics of the atoms [Bauchy et al, 2017, Fullerton and Berthier, 2020, Liu et al, 2019a. As one of the most simple sampling technique, energy-based Monte Carlo (MC) simulations aim to explore the PEL of a glass by performing a series of random "moves" (e.g., by displacing a randomly selected atom) [Allen andTildesley, 2017, Utz et al, 2000] so as to discover lower-energy states in the PEL [Arceri et al, 2020, Vollmayr-Lee et al, 2013, Welch et al, 2013. However, since MC moves do not necessarily reproduce the spontaneous dynamics of a glass as it relaxes toward lower-energy states, it is not guaranteed that the simulated glass matches that formed by experiments [Berthier and Ediger, 2020].…”
Section: Physical-knowledge-based Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, accelerated simulation techniques tend to push systems across energy barriers to accelerate their dynamics, but such accelerated dynamics may not always match the spontaneous dynamics of the atoms [Bauchy et al, 2017, Fullerton and Berthier, 2020, Liu et al, 2019a. As one of the most simple sampling technique, energy-based Monte Carlo (MC) simulations aim to explore the PEL of a glass by performing a series of random "moves" (e.g., by displacing a randomly selected atom) [Allen andTildesley, 2017, Utz et al, 2000] so as to discover lower-energy states in the PEL [Arceri et al, 2020, Vollmayr-Lee et al, 2013, Welch et al, 2013. However, since MC moves do not necessarily reproduce the spontaneous dynamics of a glass as it relaxes toward lower-energy states, it is not guaranteed that the simulated glass matches that formed by experiments [Berthier and Ediger, 2020].…”
Section: Physical-knowledge-based Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glass, an amorphous solid with elasticity, has a microscopic structure in which localized particles oscillate around their mean positions of a random lattice [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. The spatial randomness is self-generated by the particle localization that breaks translational symmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial randomness is self-generated by the particle localization that breaks translational symmetry. A remarkable feature of the random structure is that glass microscopically lacks the long-range order and is similar to liquid in terms of density–density correlations [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. As a precursor to the random structure of glass, supercooled liquids show heterogeneity over space and time [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, MF theory predicts divergences of the relaxation time that do not occur in real systems, because it does not capture relaxation mechanisms that appear in low dimensions. These are generically called activation, and they are most often pictured as the hopping of energy barriers [4,5]: Since in MF the barriers diverge with the system size N, a simple argument is that activation in MF cannot occur because barriers cannot be hopped [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%