2019
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/ab3aeb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glassy dynamics on networks: local spectra and return probabilities

Abstract: The slow relaxation and aging of glassy systems can be modelled as a Markov process on a simplified rough energy landscape: energy minima where the system tends to get trapped are taken as nodes of a random network, and the dynamics are governed by the transition rates among these. In this work we consider the case of purely activated dynamics, where the transition rates only depend on the depth of the departing trap. The random connectivity and the disorder in the trap depths make it impossible to solve the m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detectability thresholds of spectral algorithms often depend on the location of the leading and subleading eigenvalue [90,[95][96][97][98]. A fourth example of an application is the analysis of stochastic processes with spectra of Laplacian or Markov matrices [99][100][101][102][103]: the stationary state of a Markov process is the right (or left) eigenvector associated with the leading eigenvalue of a Markov matrix [103], the relaxation time is provided by the spectral gap [104][105][106], and the cumulant generating function of a timeadditive observable can be expressed in terms of the leading eigenvalues of a sequence of Markov matrices [107][108][109][110][111]. A fifth application is the study of nonHermitian quantum mechanics on random graphs [85,112,113].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detectability thresholds of spectral algorithms often depend on the location of the leading and subleading eigenvalue [90,[95][96][97][98]. A fourth example of an application is the analysis of stochastic processes with spectra of Laplacian or Markov matrices [99][100][101][102][103]: the stationary state of a Markov process is the right (or left) eigenvector associated with the leading eigenvalue of a Markov matrix [103], the relaxation time is provided by the spectral gap [104][105][106], and the cumulant generating function of a timeadditive observable can be expressed in terms of the leading eigenvalues of a sequence of Markov matrices [107][108][109][110][111]. A fifth application is the study of nonHermitian quantum mechanics on random graphs [85,112,113].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For time domain properties we obtain stochastic simulation results directly for the thermodynamic limit N → ∞, by generating an effectively infinite tree on the fly, during the course of a stochastic simulation using the Gillespie algorithm. The network construction method is identical to that used for the Bouchaud trap model in [22]; its key advantage is that it allows us to study time-dependent properties without any finite size effects. The Gillespie simulation algorithm consists of repeated evaluation the following steps:…”
Section: Results: Time Domain Properties a Numerical Simulation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main finding is that below the glass transition temperature the slowest relaxation modes, which determine the long time behavior, have a density that follows a divergent power law (Eq. ( 30)), which is characteristic of activated processes [19,22]. This contrasts with the mean field case of infinite connectivity (c → ∞), where the spectral density is constant for the slowest modes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Much progress along these lines was made in a series of works culminating with the proof that the random energy model (REM), a simple model with glassy behavior, exhibits trap-like dynamics [6][7][8]23,24]. Another consists of studying the influence of phase space connectivity on the dynamics [25,26]. In our approach, we show that the TM paradigm also applies to a very simple model of a continuous N-dimensional landscape, where each dimension represents an independent coordinate in a fictitious space with well-defined metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%