2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.96.062125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gleason-Busch theorem for sequential measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We prefer the prepare-and-measure scheme for reasons of conceptual simplicity (e.g. it does not require ancillary qubits to be invoked) as well as noting that it allows us to make a link back to the quantum reconstructions work [3] which inspired it, detailing the principles upon which security relies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We prefer the prepare-and-measure scheme for reasons of conceptual simplicity (e.g. it does not require ancillary qubits to be invoked) as well as noting that it allows us to make a link back to the quantum reconstructions work [3] which inspired it, detailing the principles upon which security relies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach contrasts with quantum mechanics as it is often presented, as a predictive theory in which a state is modified by a sequence of measurements. In a recent paper [3] we developed a framework, closely linked to that of two-time states, more suitable to the task at hand. In that work, we consider physical processes in which a quantum state is prepared and subsequently measured twice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the framework of the general measurement formalism of positive-operator-valued measures (POVM, also called probability operator measures), in 2003, Busch [4] extended Gleason's theorem for any dimension and for imperfect measurements described by positive operators, effects E i , instead of projectors. Recently (2017), in the same context of POVM, Flatt, Barnett and Croke applied the Gleason-Busch theorem to subsequent measurements [5]. Considering the operators E i and F j associated with the measurements i and j, with i before j, Flatt and coworkers proved that P r(i, j) takes the general form…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, time plays a special role in the description of a system's evolution. Moreover, the formal description of a system before and after a measurement (via a short interaction) requires considering two distinct Hilbert spaces H in ⊗ H out [13,[16][17][18]. This complexification and the central role of the time coordinate can be eliminated at once by including the measurement of time itself in a more general description of the studied interaction together with a clock system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%