2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00007-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor has a dose dependent influence on noise-induced hearing loss in the guinea pig cochlea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, when increasing the dose of pVAX2 --rGDNF plasmid to 60 mg, a significant reduction of scotopic b-wave amplitude, ONL and PR IS thickness was observed as compared with the same dose of control plasmid ET demonstrating an inverse dose-response effect. Such potential deleterious effect of GDNF dose has not been previously reported in the eye but was described in other parts of the central nervous system such as in the inner ear 64 and in the brain 65,66 using continuous GDNF-releasing systems. GDNF induced a dosedependent protective effect on sensory cell preservation and hearing function when applied directly into the guinea pig cochlea in a noise-induced hearing loss model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Surprisingly, when increasing the dose of pVAX2 --rGDNF plasmid to 60 mg, a significant reduction of scotopic b-wave amplitude, ONL and PR IS thickness was observed as compared with the same dose of control plasmid ET demonstrating an inverse dose-response effect. Such potential deleterious effect of GDNF dose has not been previously reported in the eye but was described in other parts of the central nervous system such as in the inner ear 64 and in the brain 65,66 using continuous GDNF-releasing systems. GDNF induced a dosedependent protective effect on sensory cell preservation and hearing function when applied directly into the guinea pig cochlea in a noise-induced hearing loss model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…GDNF induced a dosedependent protective effect on sensory cell preservation and hearing function when applied directly into the guinea pig cochlea in a noise-induced hearing loss model. 64 However, at the highest dose of 1 mg ml --1 (12 ng day --1 ), GDNF exacerbated hair cell and hearing loss along the cochlea in noise-exposed ears but not in healthy ears, indicating that GDNF could increase hair cells sensitivity to noise damage in the cochlea. 64 In the brain, a 6-month toxicologic study conducted in healthy rhesus monkeys demonstrated that chronic intraputamenal infusion of GDNF at the highest dose of 100 mg day --1 for 3 months followed by a 3-month treatment-free recovery period induced cerebellar Purkinje cell loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, tracer studies Ăą which use visuallydetectable markers Ăą have revealed that much of the introduced substances bound nonspecifically to non-neural tissues such as the basilar membrane, osseous spiral lamina, spiral ligament and organ of Corti, with only minor quantities of tracer detected in the cell bodies of SGNs [59,60]. Additionally, neurotrophins, as well as gene transfer vectors and transplanted cells, have been shown to spread beyond the cochlea to the vestibular apparatus, the central nervous system (CNS) and the contralateral cochlea [61][62][63][64][65]. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) provides a direct link to these organs via the cochlear aqueduct Ăą a bony channel which connects the perilymphatic space of the basal turn of the cochlea with the subarachnoid space of the posterior cranial cavity.…”
Section: Delivery Techniques For Neurotrophin Administration In the Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from visual identification of contralateral spread, there is also evidence that contralateral diffusion can be great enough to produce measurable outcomes. The unilateral infusion of GDNF protein protected HCs from noise damage in both ears at one of the higher doses [Shoji et al, 2000b]. One cause of contralateral ear contamination is fluid displacement.…”
Section: Contralateral Effects and Distant Spreadmentioning
confidence: 99%