2020
DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.19.14043-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GlideScope® versus Macintosh laryngoscope for assessment of post-thyroidectomy vocal cord dysfunction: prospective randomized study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various authors have reported or evaluated the performance of various VLs, that is, GlideScope ® ,[ 33 34 ] C-MAC,[ 30 35 ] King Vision,[ 31 ] Truview,[ 31 ] McGrath,[ 36 ] and Airtraq ® [ 9 37 38 ] VLs for visualization of vocal cords to rule out RLN injury at the end of thyroidectomy [ Table 1 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various authors have reported or evaluated the performance of various VLs, that is, GlideScope ® ,[ 33 34 ] C-MAC,[ 30 35 ] King Vision,[ 31 ] Truview,[ 31 ] McGrath,[ 36 ] and Airtraq ® [ 9 37 38 ] VLs for visualization of vocal cords to rule out RLN injury at the end of thyroidectomy [ Table 1 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Elbeialy et al . [ 34 ] concluded GlideScope to have higher diagnostic accuracy (94.2%) for detecting vocal cord disfunction than Macintosh laryngoscope with 86.7% sensitivity and 95.2% specificity. The CL score was found to be significantly better with GlideScope than by direct laryngoscopy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%