2020
DOI: 10.17116/neiro20208404161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glioblastoma in the region of previously resected meningioma. Case report and literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nazarov VV and Sahuc P et al reported 2 cases of patients with GBM in the same anatomical position as the previous meningioma resection. [8,9] In contrast to these patients, in the case we report herein, a new GBM developed in the contralateral cerebral hemisphere 3 years after meningioma resection. A review of the literature reveals that this is the first case of its type to be reported.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Nazarov VV and Sahuc P et al reported 2 cases of patients with GBM in the same anatomical position as the previous meningioma resection. [8,9] In contrast to these patients, in the case we report herein, a new GBM developed in the contralateral cerebral hemisphere 3 years after meningioma resection. A review of the literature reveals that this is the first case of its type to be reported.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Nine case reports describing the transformation of meningioma to malignant high-grade glioma GBM were identified [Table 1]. [6,8,11,12,16,18,[21][22][23] In three cases, SRS-GK was used for treatment of meningioma. Age at the time of the initial lesion diagnosis ranged from 47 to 74 years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,24] eoretically, the probability of meningioma and glioma appearing in the same anatomical location is 1 patient every 5 years. [11] Ohba et al reported on the potential of meningeal tumor cells to induce glioma genesis in surrounding glial tissue. [12] erefore, the possibility of two distinct histological tumors coexisting at initial presentation, although rare, should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation