2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2004.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GLMs, GAMs and GLMMs: an overview of theory for applications in fisheries research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
225
0
20

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 355 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
225
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Proportion data, such as change metrics or land cover metrics, do not exhibit the same variance for the mean across the entire range of possible values. As the mean value approaches 0% or 100% cover, variance tends to zero, while it is maximum near a mean of 50% [60,61]. Classic tests, such as Student's t-test or ANOVA, assume equal within-group variances and their independence of the group mean, whereas the logit link function naturally models the change in variance across the range of the mean values (i.e., 0% and 100% [58,59]).…”
Section: Comparison Methods For Cumulative Impact Of Oil and Hurricanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proportion data, such as change metrics or land cover metrics, do not exhibit the same variance for the mean across the entire range of possible values. As the mean value approaches 0% or 100% cover, variance tends to zero, while it is maximum near a mean of 50% [60,61]. Classic tests, such as Student's t-test or ANOVA, assume equal within-group variances and their independence of the group mean, whereas the logit link function naturally models the change in variance across the range of the mean values (i.e., 0% and 100% [58,59]).…”
Section: Comparison Methods For Cumulative Impact Of Oil and Hurricanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalized linear modeling (GLM) was used to explore the contribution and role of environmental variables and spatial metrics in explaining fish presence and abundance at two spatial scales, based on the framework suggested by Austin (2002). GLM was used because it can deal with several families of probability distributions for ecological data (Guisan et al 2002;Venables & Dichmont 2004). At the sample scale, the most probable Figure 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the catch and effort data of each vessel are longitudinal data, which means that several measurements are made on the same experimental units over time. In fisheries science, in these cases the use of GLMMs is recommended (VENABLES and DICHMONT, 2004). Moreover, the random terms do not contribute to the fixed part of the mean, but the variance components associated with them inflate the variability of predictions in an appropriate way (VENABLES and DICHMONT, 2004;CRAWLEY, 2007).…”
Section: Discussion Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fisheries science, in these cases the use of GLMMs is recommended (VENABLES and DICHMONT, 2004). Moreover, the random terms do not contribute to the fixed part of the mean, but the variance components associated with them inflate the variability of predictions in an appropriate way (VENABLES and DICHMONT, 2004;CRAWLEY, 2007). The analysis of abundance indices by GLM may underestimate the level of variability since it ignores the grouped nature of tows within vessels (HELSER et al, 2004;BAUM and BLANCHARD, 2010).…”
Section: Discussion Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation