2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11590-018-1378-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global algorithm for solving linear multiplicative programming problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this subsection, we give several exact examples to illustrate that the algorithm OSBBRA is effective and feasible. Example 1 [23,25,26,42] min…”
Section: Feasibility Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this subsection, we give several exact examples to illustrate that the algorithm OSBBRA is effective and feasible. Example 1 [23,25,26,42] min…”
Section: Feasibility Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that the calculation results of this algorithm are the same as those of BARON, but the running time of CPU used in our algorithm is less than that of BARON, especially the number of iterations used by BARON in solving Example 8 is much higher than that of algorithm OSBBRA. [26] (1.3148, 0.1396, 0.0, 0.4233) 0.8902 1 0.0601 10 −6 [39] (1.3148, 0.1396, 0.0000, 0.4233) 0.890190 3 0.047 0.05 [42] ( 8 BARON (1.0000, 1.9999, 1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000) 9503.9999 155 1.4662 10 −6 OSBBRA (1.0000, 2.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000) 9503.9999 2 0.0691 10 −6…”
Section: Feasibility Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 9 (Shen and Huang [31]; Wang et al [15]). Example 10 (Shen and Huang [31]; Wang et al [15]).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In last two decades, many algorithms have been proposed for globally solving the problem (GAMP) and its special cases. According to characteristics of these algorithms, these algorithms can be mainly classified into parametric simplex algorithm [8], parametric successive underestimation method [9], monotonic optimization approach [10], rectangular branch-and-bound algorithms [11]- [18], outcome space approaches [19]- [24], polynomial time approximation algorithms [25]- [27], optimal level set methods [28], [29], linear decomposition methods [30], [31], heuristic method [32], outer approximation algorithm [33], and so on. Moreover, most of these reviewed algorithms require that each affine function in the objective function must be positive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last several decades, many algorithms have been developed for globally solving the (QPWQC) and its special cases, such as branch-and-bound method [12,13], approximation approach [14], robust approach [15], branch-reduce-bound algorithm [16][17][18][19], geometric programming approach [20][21][22][23], and others. Except for the above approaches, some global optimization algorithms [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] for linear multiplicative programming problems and generalized linear fractional programming problems can be used to solve the quadratic programs with quadratic constraints (QPWQC) considered in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%