We have magnetically imaged interlayer Josephson vortices emergin %!!?g% planes of single crystals of the organic superconductor~-(BEDT-TTF)z CU(N 5 single layer cuprate high-T~superconductors TkBazCuOcti (TI-2201) and (Hg,Cu Bz@u( Hg-1201), using a scanning Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (@I@ microscope. These images provide a direct measurement of the interIayer penetration deptw hich is approximately 63pm for~-(BEDT-TTF)z CU(NCS)Z, 18~m for T1-2201 and 8pm for Hg-1201. The lengths for the cuprates are about a factor of 10 larger than originally pre&cted by the interlayer tunneling model for the mechanism of superconductivity in layered compounds, irdcating that thk mechanism alone cannot account for the high critical temperatures in these materials. .Key words: interlayer, vortex, SQUID, magnetic, microscopy Many unconventional superconductors, notably cuprates and some organics, have a strongly anisotropic layered structure. The layered superconductors are commonly modekd using the Lawrence-Doniach model [l], as a stack of "conventional" superconducting layers with Josephson coupliig beh.veen the layers. The strength of the interlayer coupling is an important partieter in any phenomenological description of these materials, but it can be difllcult to measure. We discuss in this paper a duect way to measure this interlayer couplin~by imaging vortices trapped parallel to, and screened by, the superconducting layers. The magneti? "shape" of these vortices is directly related to the strength of the interlayer coupling, through the interlayer penetration depth lL=(c0J8z%J0 )ln [2], where JOis tie interlayer critical current density, c is the speed of Iigh$ @O =hd2e is the superconducting flux quanu h is Planck's constan; e is the charge on the electro~and s is the interlayer spacing. Clem and Coffey derived expressions for the structure of vortices parallel to the layers (Fig. la), called "interlayer Josephson vortices", in the context of the Lawrence-Doniach mode1 [2]. Except at the smalkst length scales, these vortices are identical to vortices in an anisotropic London model. Kogan and Clem [3] calculated the magnetic fields from an anisotropic vortex extending above a superconducting surface. By comparing these expression with our measurements, we get quantitative values for the interlayer penetration depths.~T