2007
DOI: 10.1080/13658810600911903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global and local spatial indices of urban segregation

Abstract: Urban segregation has received increasing attention in the literature due to the negative impacts that it has on urban populations. Indices of urban segregation are useful instruments for understanding the problem as well as for setting up public policies. The usefulness of spatial segregation indices depends on their ability to account for the spatial arrangement of population and to show how segregation varies across the city. This paper proposes global spatial indices of segregation that capture interaction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
44

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
91
0
44
Order By: Relevance
“…Global and local versions of the generalized spatial dissimilarity index (D and d j ) and the spatial isolation index (Q m and q m;j ) were adopted. While global indices summarize the segregation degree of the whole city, the local indices show segregation as a spatially variant phenomenon that can be displayed in maps (Feitosa et al, 2007).…”
Section: Urban-population Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Global and local versions of the generalized spatial dissimilarity index (D and d j ) and the spatial isolation index (Q m and q m;j ) were adopted. While global indices summarize the segregation degree of the whole city, the local indices show segregation as a spatially variant phenomenon that can be displayed in maps (Feitosa et al, 2007).…”
Section: Urban-population Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segregation state of the population (P seg ) is depicted by spatial indices of segregation as described by Feitosa, Câmara, Monteiro, Koschitzki, and Silva (2007). Global and local versions of the generalized spatial dissimilarity index (D and d j ) and the spatial isolation index (Q m and q m;j ) were adopted.…”
Section: Urban-population Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers in Reference [3] study segregation as spaces of activities, analyzing the indexes of evenness/clustering and exposure/isolation. This context reinforces the idea of urban segregation as the absence of interactions in space or as the exclusion to opportunities of access to activities and services in the cities [1, [17][18][19].…”
Section: Urban Segregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [1] defines segregation as the restriction of interaction involving or not involving the physical space. In architecture and urban planning studies, urban segregation is commonly approached as separation [2,3]. Segregation is the separation of people, activities and functions [4] and it can hardly be approached without considering its spatial aspect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, instead of treating each location and its population density as isolated units, these researchers treated population density as a continuous surface. Moreover, Feitosa et al (2007) developed a geographically weighted population index in which the population count of a geographic unit is geographically weighted (instead of the population density), and they used this index to measure urban segregation at different scales and better capture the interaction between groups across geographic boundaries. Certain studies have also used indices for overcrowding.…”
Section: Impact Of Geographic Context In Demographic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%