Global and Regional Functional Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease with Cardiac MR Imaging

Collins, Jeremy D.

doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2014.11.001

Cited by 18 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[8] In regards to accuracy, CMR is considered as the gold standard for volumetric and EF assessment, with better tissue characterization and endocardium de nition. [9] Previous studies had shown a strong correlation and agreement between 2DTTE and CMR in LV measurement [10], which was further con rmed in this study. However, the strength of intermodality correlation for LVEF (r = 0.71) was found to be lower than that in prior studies.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Agreement in left ventricular function measured by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with chronic total occlusion

Zhang

Wang

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To determine the agreement between two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2DTTE) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in left ventricular (LV) function in CTO patients: including end-systolic volume (LVESV), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and ejection fraction (LVEF).Methods: Eighty-eight CTO patients were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent 2DTTE and CMR within one week of each other. The correlation and agreement of LVEF, LVESV and LVEDV as measured by 2DTTE and CMR were assessed using Pearson correlation, Kappa analysis and Bland-Altman method. Results: The mean age of patients enrolled was 57 ± 10 years. There was a strong correlation (r=0.71, 0.90 and 0.80, respectively, all P<0.001) and a moderately strong agreement (Kappa=0.62, P<0.001) between the two modalities in measurement of LV function. The agreement in patients with EF≧50% was better than in those with an EF <50%. CTO patients without echocardiographic WMA had stronger intermodality correlations (r=0.84, 0.96, and 0.87, respectively) and smaller biases in LV function measurement.Conclusions: The difference in measurement between 2DTTE and CMR should be noticed in CTO patients with EF<50% or abnormal ventricular motion. CMR should be considered in these conditions.Trial registration: Retrospectively registered

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Agreement in left ventricular function measured by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with chronic total occlusion

Zhang

Wang

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Reproducibility is an important measure for image analysis and is a determinant for the robustness of the technique. In previous studies, global strains derived from FT‐cardiac MRI showed good reproducibility, whereas segmental myocardial strains from FT‐cardiac MRI were not acceptable . The poor segmental reproducibility in FT‐cardiac MRI could be related to the calculation method inherent to the software.…”

mentioning

confidence: 92%

Improved segmental myocardial strain reproducibility using deformable registration algorithms compared with feature tracking cardiac MRI and speckle tracking echocardiography

Wang

Sun

et al. 2017

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Quantifying regional function using quantitative imaging parameters such as myocardial velocities and strain has shown promising results in the occurrence of LV dysfunction with normal EF. 29 To understand regional function better, it is necessary to understand the myocardial structure and muscle fiber orientation. The LV has three different fiber orientations with circumferential, oblique and longitudinal layers, arranged in two helical geometries.…”

Section: D and 3d Echocardiographymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…32 Various CMR techniques are available for the assessment of regional LV function such as myocardial thickening, balanced steady-state free precession imaging (bSSFP), tissue phase mapping (TPM), myocardial tagging, displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE), strain encoding (SENC), and feature-tracking MRI (FT-MRI). 29 The bSSFP technique is most commonly used for the quantitative or qualitative segmental analysis of the wall motion, which is more sensitive than global function in IHD. The image recording in bSSFP can be segmented or ECG-triggered real-time cine.…”

Section: D and 3d Echocardiographymentioning

confidence: 99%

New Imaging-Based Tools for the Assessment of Ventricular Function in Ischemic Heart Diseases

Bordi¹,

Kovács²,

Bajka³

et al. 2017

Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ischemic heart disease morbidity and mortality are closely related to global and regional left ventricular function. The evaluation of left ventricular global function is a relevant part in the evolution of ischemic heart disease because it plays a significant role in prognosis prediction and patient management after revascularization. Regional function is also a critical part of the evolution, offering a possible and reliable mode for the assessment of myocardial disease. Currently several techniques for the evaluation of left ventricular parameters and function are in use. In this review we will discuss and compare currently available methods for the evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function such as 2D and 3D echocardiography, 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography, multi-slice computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.Keywords: ischemic heart disease, echocardiography, 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography, multi-slice computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging REVIEW DOI: 10.1515/jim-2017-0020 CARDIOLOGY // IMAGING Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death around the world. The morbidity and mortality rates are closely associated to regional and global left ventricular function in these patients. 1,2 The evaluation of global left ventricular (LV) function with noninvasive imaging tools has an important role in the therapeutic management and prognosis of patients with ischemic cardiac diseases. Several parameters have been proposed as illustrative for global left ventricular function such as volumes, ejection fraction, dimensions, end-diastolic pressure, contractility, and deformation parameters. Global systolic function is most often evaluated by measuring the difference in the end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, determined in one, two and three dimensions, divided by the adequate end-diastolic volume. 3 Echocardiography is the most frequently used noninvasive technique for the analysis of LV parameters and function because of its accessibility, portability, and widely validated scale.

show abstract

Global and Regional Functional Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease with Cardiac MR Imaging

Cited by 18 publications

References 68 publications

Agreement in left ventricular function measured by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with chronic total occlusion

Agreement in left ventricular function measured by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with chronic total occlusion

Improved segmental myocardial strain reproducibility using deformable registration algorithms compared with feature tracking cardiac MRI and speckle tracking echocardiography

New Imaging-Based Tools for the Assessment of Ventricular Function in Ischemic Heart Diseases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About