2024
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.29591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global burden of vaccine‐associated multiple sclerosis, 1967–2022: A comprehensive analysis of the international pharmacovigilance database

Ho Geol Woo,
Hyeon Jin Kim,
Jaeyu Park
et al.

Abstract: Vaccine‐associated multiple sclerosis (MS) is rare, with insufficient evidence from case reports. Given the scarcity of large‐scale data investigating the association between vaccine administration and adverse events, we investigated the global burden of vaccine‐associated MS and potential related vaccines from 1967 to 2022. Reports on vaccine‐associated MS between 1967 and 2022 were obtained from the World Health Organization International Pharmacovigilance Database (total number of reports = 120 715 116). We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also employed this method to identify risk factors of AD and calculate the ratio of odds ratio (OR) by using odds ratios from before and during the pandemic. We further determined risk factors for the years 2020, 2021 and 2022, to deepen our understanding of the pandemic's impact [33][34][35] . Categorical data were presented as frequencies and percentages, whereas numerical data were presented as means along with their corresponding 95% CIs.…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also employed this method to identify risk factors of AD and calculate the ratio of odds ratio (OR) by using odds ratios from before and during the pandemic. We further determined risk factors for the years 2020, 2021 and 2022, to deepen our understanding of the pandemic's impact [33][34][35] . Categorical data were presented as frequencies and percentages, whereas numerical data were presented as means along with their corresponding 95% CIs.…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Categorical data were presented as frequencies and percentages, whereas numerical data were presented as means along with their corresponding 95% CIs. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 9.5.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) [35][36][37] .…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%