2015 22nd International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/time.2015.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Caching for the Flat Coalgebraic µ-Calculus

Abstract: We present a sound, complete, and optimal single-pass tableau algorithm for the alternation-free µ-calculus. The algorithm supports global caching with intermediate propagation and runs in time 2 O(n) . In game-theoretic terms, our algorithm integrates the steps for constructing and solving the Büchi game arising from the input tableau into a single procedure; this is done onthe-fly, i.e. may terminate before the game has been fully constructed. This suggests a slogan to the effect that global caching = game … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown in previous work [30] that model checking for coalgebraic µ-calculi against coalgebras with state space U reduces to solving a canonical fixpoint equation system over the powerset lattice P(U ), where the involved function interprets modal operators using predicate liftings, as described in [14,30]. This canonical equation system can alternatively be seen as the winning region of Eloise in coalgebraic parity games, a highly general variant of parity games where the game structure is a coalgebra and nodes are annotated with modalities.…”
Section: Systems Of Fixpoint Equationssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown in previous work [30] that model checking for coalgebraic µ-calculi against coalgebras with state space U reduces to solving a canonical fixpoint equation system over the powerset lattice P(U ), where the involved function interprets modal operators using predicate liftings, as described in [14,30]. This canonical equation system can alternatively be seen as the winning region of Eloise in coalgebraic parity games, a highly general variant of parity games where the game structure is a coalgebra and nodes are annotated with modalities.…”
Section: Systems Of Fixpoint Equationssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…This level of generality is achieved by abstracting system types as set functors and systems as coalgebras for the given functor following the paradigm of universal coalgebra [49]. It was previously shown [30] that the model checking problem for coalgebraic µ-calculi reduces to the computation of a nested fixpoint. This fixpoint may be seen as a coalgebraic generalization of a parity game winning region but can be literally phrased in terms of small standard parity games (implying quasipolynomial run time) only in restricted cases.…”
Section: In Recent Breakthrough Work On the Solution Of Parity Games In Quasipolynomialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of games in μ-calculus satisfiability checking goes back to Niwiński and Walukiewicz [18] and has since been extended to the unguarded μcalculus [10] and the coalgebraic μ-calculus [2]. Game-based procedures for the relational μ-calculus have been implemented in MLSolver [9], and for the alternation-free coalgebraic μ-calculus in COOL [13].…”
Section: Related Work Liu and Wangmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, if Eloise wins a parity game with n priorities, then she can ensure that in each play, each odd priority 1 ≤ i ≤ n is visited only finitely often, unless a priority greater than i is visited infinitely often (the converse does not hold in general [4]): Additionally, we devise two series of unsatisfiable formulas that exhibit the advantages of COOL's global caching and on-the-fly-solving capabilities. These formulas are inspired by the CTL-formula series early(n, j, k) and early gc (n, j, k) from [13] but contain fixpoint-alternation of depth 2 k inside the subformula θ:…”
Section: Implementation and Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation