Global change, ensuing vulnerabilities, and social responses in marine environments

Bundy, Alida; Chuenpagdee, Ratana; Cooley, Sarah R.; Glaeser, Bernhard; McManus, Liana Talaue

doi:10.1007/s10113-015-0906-y

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A better understanding of how fishing communities, particularly SSCF, respond to climate and non‐climate stressors is paramount to improve the ability to plan and implement effective adaptation action (Brooks et al., ), and to mobilise and use appropriate adaptive capacity effectively. Nevertheless, empirical research that seeks to explore how individuals, communities, organisations and sectors (including SSCF) in developing countries respond to stressors is limited (Bundy et al., ; Cinner et al., ; Lwasa, ). This study aims to understand the adaptive capacity of SSCF to multiple stressors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptive capacity of small‐scale coastal fishers to climate and non‐climate stressors in the Western region of Ghana

Freduah

Fidelman

Smith

2018

Geographical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Small‐scale coastal fisheries (SSCF) in the Western region of Ghana are affected by a combination of climate and non‐climate stressors. Coastal communities are particularly vulnerable to these stressors because of their proximity to the sea and high dependence on small‐scale fisheries for their livelihoods. A better understanding of how fishing communities, particularly SSCF, respond to climate and non‐climate stressors is paramount to improve planning and implementation of effective adaptation action. Drawing on the capitals framework, this study examines the adaptive capacity of SSCF to the combined effects of climate‐related (increasing coastal erosion, and wave and storm frequency) and non‐climate‐related stressors (declining catches; scarcity and prohibitive cost of fuel; inconsiderate implementation of fisheries laws and policies; competition from the oil and gas industry; sand mining; and algal blooms). The findings show how fishers mobilise and use adaptive capacity through exploitation of various forms of capital, including cultural capital (e.g., local innovation); political capital (e.g., lobbying government and local authorities); social capital (e.g., collective action); human capital (e.g., local leadership); and natural capital (e.g., utilising beach sand) to respond to multiple stressors. Nevertheless, in many cases, fishers’ responses were reactive and led to negative (maladaptive) outcomes. Furthermore, this study underscores the importance of critically considering the interactive nature of capitals and how they collectively influence adaptive capacity in the planning and implementation of adaptation research, policy and practice.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%