2019
DOI: 10.1111/geb.12940
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global community breaks at 60 m on mesophotic coral reefs

Abstract: Aim Mesophotic coral ecosystems (MCEs) are unique communities that support a high proportion of depth‐endemic species distinct from shallow‐water coral reefs. However, there is currently little consensus on the boundaries between shallow and mesophotic coral reefs and between upper versus lower MCEs because studies of these communities are often site specific. Here, we examine the ecological evidence for community breaks, defined here as species loss, in fish and benthic taxa between shallow reefs and MCEs glo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

12
82
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
12
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shift in benthic community composition is likely to also affect the availability of DOM, since benthic primary producers are considered to be an important source of bioavailable DOM on coral reefs (Haas et al ; Mueller et al ). Furthermore, decreasing light levels reduce DOM release by benthic primary producers (Mueller et al , ), which supports observations that DOM concentrations decrease with increasing depth (Torréton et al ; Slattery and Lesser ; Mueller et al ; Lesser et al ). In contrast, we also know that POC increases with increasing depth into the mesophotic zone (e.g., Lesser ).…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…This shift in benthic community composition is likely to also affect the availability of DOM, since benthic primary producers are considered to be an important source of bioavailable DOM on coral reefs (Haas et al ; Mueller et al ). Furthermore, decreasing light levels reduce DOM release by benthic primary producers (Mueller et al , ), which supports observations that DOM concentrations decrease with increasing depth (Torréton et al ; Slattery and Lesser ; Mueller et al ; Lesser et al ). In contrast, we also know that POC increases with increasing depth into the mesophotic zone (e.g., Lesser ).…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…But while most sponges consume both POC and DOC, not all sponges produce detritus (e.g., McMurray, Stubler, Erwin, Finelli, & Pawlik, ). The amount of detritus produced also decreases with increasing depth (Lesser, Slattery, et al, ), and may be a result of the decreased availability of DOC, while POC increases, with increasing depth (Lesser, Slattery, Laverick, Macartney, & Bridge, ). The general increase in trophic resources, as carbon and nitrogen, with increasing depth (Lesser, Mueller, et al, ; Lesser, Slattery, et al, ) results in faster growing, and larger, sponges dominating the community on deep, mesophotic, reefs (>30 m: Lesser, ; Lesser & Slattery, ; Lesser, Slattery, et al, ).…”
Section: Trophic Ecology Of Spongesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of detritus produced also decreases with increasing depth (Lesser, Slattery, et al, ), and may be a result of the decreased availability of DOC, while POC increases, with increasing depth (Lesser, Slattery, Laverick, Macartney, & Bridge, ). The general increase in trophic resources, as carbon and nitrogen, with increasing depth (Lesser, Mueller, et al, ; Lesser, Slattery, et al, ) results in faster growing, and larger, sponges dominating the community on deep, mesophotic, reefs (>30 m: Lesser, ; Lesser & Slattery, ; Lesser, Slattery, et al, ). This occurs because PON, as a component of POM, is a very important source of nitrogen that varies along the shallow to mesophotic depth gradient down to depths of at least 90 m (Lesser, ; Lesser, Slattery, et al, ).…”
Section: Trophic Ecology Of Spongesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Lesser et al () page 1411, scaling on the y‐axis of panel B in Figure was incorrect. The “significant effect of depth” and “figure legend” remains the same, while the “magnitude of the absolute numbers” is different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%