2022
DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global disparity bias in ophthalmology artificial intelligence applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the results with the current state of the art methods in BRSET [74,75], and with the current state of the art foundational model RetFound [32] to predict diabetic retinopathy. The models demonstrated varying degrees of accuracy and F1 scores across different classification tasks (5-class, 3-class, and binary).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the results with the current state of the art methods in BRSET [74,75], and with the current state of the art foundational model RetFound [32] to predict diabetic retinopathy. The models demonstrated varying degrees of accuracy and F1 scores across different classification tasks (5-class, 3-class, and binary).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer treatment outcomes have been observed due to inappropriate risk assessment and, therefore, inappropriate preventive practices [ 65 ]. In ophthalmology articles, there was an identified lack of representation of various demographic characteristics and pathological entities in publicly available datasets, prompting the need for a collaborative approach to reach real-world deployment [ 15 , 66 , 67 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorrect training of ML models can lead to inaccurate results and potentially lead to inadequate care for patients in need [ 8 ]. For instance, the performance of automated DR algorithms varies considerably due to limited training data, heterogeneity in disease presentations, and suboptimal image quality [ 9 , 10 ]. Moreover, ophthalmological ML-ready datasets are only available in a few countries, leaving a large number of countries unrepresented in training and validation cohorts [ 11 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%