2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13662-020-03145-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global dynamics of a novel deterministic and stochastic SIR epidemic model with vertical transmission and media coverage

Abstract: In this paper, we study a novel deterministic and stochastic SIR epidemic model with vertical transmission and media coverage. For the deterministic model, we give the basic reproduction number $R_{0}$ R 0 which determines the extinction or prevalence of the disease. In addition, for the stochastic model, we prove existence and uniqueness of the positive solution, and extinction and persistence in mean. Furthermore, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the deterministic approach provides an overall insight about the disease spreading in a fast way, whereas the stochastic framework provides statistical insights into the transmission events providing a range of possible epidemic scenarios [22]. Deterministic models tend to present results that do not undergo major changes due to fluctuations in the population, but undergo significant changes if the parameters inserted in the differential equations are modified; in this context, the stochastic models are more responsive to quantitative changes both in the populations and subpopulations, as well as in the modeling parameters, making it important to emphasize that there are several ways of working probabilities in stochastic processes as addressed above, which makes these models too complex and difficult to interpret [22,30,35]. Moreover, both deterministic and stochastic models share the challenge in representing the natural history of infectious diseases, considering sources of infection, transmission routes, incubation period, infection and transmissibility periods, treatment, and development of natural immunity, which are parameters that can be implemented in mathematical systems through three ways: i) Using data already described in the literature [36], ii) Empirically through estimations with basis on epidemiological data [37,38], or iii) Estimated by computer programs using statistical methods such as root mean square error on epidemiological data [17].…”
Section: Deterministic Versus Stochasticmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…That is, the deterministic approach provides an overall insight about the disease spreading in a fast way, whereas the stochastic framework provides statistical insights into the transmission events providing a range of possible epidemic scenarios [22]. Deterministic models tend to present results that do not undergo major changes due to fluctuations in the population, but undergo significant changes if the parameters inserted in the differential equations are modified; in this context, the stochastic models are more responsive to quantitative changes both in the populations and subpopulations, as well as in the modeling parameters, making it important to emphasize that there are several ways of working probabilities in stochastic processes as addressed above, which makes these models too complex and difficult to interpret [22,30,35]. Moreover, both deterministic and stochastic models share the challenge in representing the natural history of infectious diseases, considering sources of infection, transmission routes, incubation period, infection and transmissibility periods, treatment, and development of natural immunity, which are parameters that can be implemented in mathematical systems through three ways: i) Using data already described in the literature [36], ii) Empirically through estimations with basis on epidemiological data [37,38], or iii) Estimated by computer programs using statistical methods such as root mean square error on epidemiological data [17].…”
Section: Deterministic Versus Stochasticmentioning
confidence: 94%