2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3817111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global economic impacts of climate shocks, climate policy and changes in climate risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a combined asset pricing in an endogenous growth model, Hambel et al (2020) find that the risk‐free interest rate decreases due to additional precautionary savings needed to cope with global warming. Fernando et al (2021) associate climate shocks with higher equity risk premia, which according to their simulations could lead to a loss in economic activity each year of up to 2% of GDP in the worst‐case scenario. Bolton & Kacperczyk (2020) find that investors in US stock markets also charge a premium for the risk of holding the stocks of disproportionately high carbon emitters.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Main Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a combined asset pricing in an endogenous growth model, Hambel et al (2020) find that the risk‐free interest rate decreases due to additional precautionary savings needed to cope with global warming. Fernando et al (2021) associate climate shocks with higher equity risk premia, which according to their simulations could lead to a loss in economic activity each year of up to 2% of GDP in the worst‐case scenario. Bolton & Kacperczyk (2020) find that investors in US stock markets also charge a premium for the risk of holding the stocks of disproportionately high carbon emitters.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Main Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending this analysis to a corporate level, the authors show that exposure and vulnerability to climate change is strongly associated with a higher cost of capital (cost of borrowing) and lower levels of productivity and return on investment. Fernando, Liu, and McKibbin (2021) examined sensitivity of stock indices to the global macroeconomic consequences of chronic climate change and extreme climate shocks as well as the economic effects of transition risk of exposure to climate policies. The authors confirmed the results of other studies regarding the economic costs of climate change and the transition risk of climate policy.…”
Section: Valuation: the Curse Of Terminal Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter stream of literature tends to consider the entire economy as a whole, ignoring sectoral heterogeneity in their estimates and lacking firm-level effects. The closer papers for this paper, accounting for sectoral changes, are Fernando (2023) and Fernando et al (2021). They also adopt the G-Cubed to estimate the global economic consequences of climate shocks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also adopt the G-Cubed to estimate the global economic consequences of climate shocks. Fernando et al (2021) investigate the economic impacts due to both physical and transition risks 10 on different sectors 11 in different economies. We extend their framework by estimating the sectoral productivity impacts of physical risks using firm-level data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%